Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50475 (AP)

Sivakoti Samyuktha v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/5541/2021 · 2025-11-23

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010096062021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5541/2021 Between: 1. SIVAKOTI SAMYUKTHA, W O (LATE) NARAYAN.A MURTHY, AGED 72 YEARS, D. NO. 20-54, LINGALA THOTA COLONY, 9TH LINE, 19TH WARD, PAYAKARAOPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 531126 2. SIVAKOTI MADHU, S/O. SIVAKOTI NARAYANA MURTHY, AGED 42 YEARS, D. NO. 20-54, LINGALA THOTA COLONY, 9TH LINE, 19TH WARD, PAYAKARAOPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHA DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 531126 ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT HOME DEPARTMENT SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, TULLURU VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, AP POLICE HEAD QUARTERS, NEAR 6TH BATALIAN, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522001 3. THE INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, 0/O INSPECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ELURU, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 534006 4. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, RURAL 0/O SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE RURAL, VISAKHAPATNAM 2 DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH - 530043 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PAYAKARAOPETA POLICE STATION, PAYAKARAOPETA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 531126. 6. MEDIKONDA NARASAMURTHY, S/O BALA, AGED 48 YEARS, L.T. COLONY, 2ND STREET FROM NATIONAL PAYAKARAOPETA VILLAGE AND MANDAL VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHA DISTRICT ANDHRA PRADESH. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the Respondents 2 to 4 in not considering the complaint made by the Petitioner on 18-09-2020 against the 4th Respondent in not registering the crime on 6th Respondent and in turn threatening the Petitioner to withdraw the complaint made by the Petitioner as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to consider the complaint made by the Petitioner on 18-09-2020 and take action against the 5th Respondent as per the rules in vogue and issue such other writ or order or direction as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of case. IA NO: 1 OF 2021 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to consider the complaint made by the Petitioner on 18-09-2020 and take action against the 5th Respondent as per the rules in vogue, pending disposal of the Writ Petition, in the interest of justice and pass Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. SRI VIJAY MATHUKUMILLI Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. RAM BABU DEVAVARAPU 3 The Court made the following order: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue an appropriate writ more in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the inaction on the part of the Respondents 2 to 4 in not considering the complaint made by the Petitioner on 18.09.2020 against the 4th Respondent in not registering the crime on 6th Respondent and in turn threatening the Petitioner to withdraw the complaint made by the Petitioner as being arbitrary, illegal and violative of articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 4 to consider the complaint made by the Petitioner on 18.09.2020 and take action against the 5th Respondent as per the rules in vogue and issue such other writ or order or direction as deemed fit and proper in the circumstances of case and pass...…” 2. Heard Sri M.Sri Vijay, learned Counsel for the petitioners and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. Learned counsel for the petitioners would submit that the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 4. Learned Assistant Government Pleader is in attendance. 5. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is dismissed since the relief has become infructuous. No order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 24.11.2025 SNI 4 31 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 5541/2021 Dt.24.11.2025 SNI