Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010161712019
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3209] TUESDAY,THE FOURTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA WRIT PETITION NO: 7002/2019 Between:
1. KOTHARU GOPALA KRISHNA,, S/O APPA RAO, AGED 72 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION,
R/O KUKKUNURU, (VANDM), WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT
2. KOTHARU MAMAM, S/O LATE APPA RAO, AGED 64 YEARS, OCC AGRICULTURE, R/O H.NO. 2-36/3, KUKKUNOOR VILLAGE 86 MANDAL, KHAMMA DISTRICT
3. KOTHARU BHASKAR RAO, , S/O APPA RAO, AGED 62 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O KUKKUNURU, (VANDM), WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT,
4. KOTHARU PANDU RANGA RAO,, S/O APPA RAO, AGED 60 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION/ADVOCATE, R/O H.NO. 4--61/2, SRINAGAR, KHAMMAM.
...PETITIONER(S) AND
1. THE STATE OF AP, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY (REVENUE) SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI.
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, EELURU, ANDHRA PRADESH
3. THE SPECIAL COLLECTOR LAND ACQUISITION POLAVARAM IRRIGATION PROJECT, RAJAMENDRY EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
4. THE LAND ACQUISITION OFFICER AND SUB COLLECTOR,
NJS,J W.P No.7002 of 2019 2
KUKNOOR, W G DISTRICT.
5. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, . KUKUNOOR, KUKUNOOR MANDAL WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
6. SMT ATCHUTAMBA, W/O LATE RAJ SEKHAR AGED 47 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O MAREDUBAKA VILLAGE, KUKUNOOR MANDAL, WG DISTRICT.
7. RAI NIKHIL, S/O LATE RAI SEKHAR, AGED 24 YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE, R/O MAREDUBAKA VILLAGE, KUKUNOOR MANDAL, WG DISTRICT..
8. RAI PAVAN, S/O LATE RAI SEKHAR, AGED 22 YEARS, OCC EMPLOYEE, R/O MAREDUBAKA VILLAGE, KUKUNOOR MANDAL, WG DISTRICT.
9. RAI KRISHNA, S/O LATE NARASAIAH, AGED 50 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O MAREDUBAKA VILLAGE, KUKUNOOR MANDAL, WG DISTRICT
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner(S):
1. P RAMA SHARANA SHARMA Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR LAND ACQUISITION (AP)
NJS,J W.P No.7002 of 2019 3
The Court made the following Order:
Mr. P Pavan Chowdary, learned counsel representing the learned counsel for the petitioners, states that in view of subsequent development the cause in the writ petition does not survive, as such the matter has become infructuous.
2. Recording the same, this Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. No costs. Miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed.
__________________________ JUSTICE NINALA JAYASURYA Date:04.11.2025 Ksj