Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5046 (KAR)

SMT PRAVEENA A FERNANDES W/O AGNEL FERNANDES v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.RP/100120/2025 · 2025-04-03

V Srishananda

Criminal Appealbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5984 CRL.RP No. 100120 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 3RD DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100120 OF 2025 (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: SMT.PRAVEENA A. FERNANDES W/O. AGNEL FERNANDES, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/O. SHIRWAD VILLAGE, KARWAR TALUK-581304, UTTARA KANNADA DISTRICT. …PETITIONER (BY SRI PRAVEEN P. TARIKAR, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA REP. BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD-01, THROUGH ITS KARWAR RURAL POLICE STATION. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI PRAVEENA Y. DEVAREDDIYAVARA, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED U/SEC.438 R/W. 442 OF BNSS 2023, SEEKING TO CALL THE RECORDS IN CRL.A NO. 137/2023 ON THE FILE OF PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE UTTARA KANNADA, KARWAR ORDER DATED 12.03.2025 AND IN C.C.NO. 217/2019 ON THE FILE OF ADDL. SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC, KARWAR AND SET AISE THE ORDER DATED 12.03.2025 IN CRL.A NO. 137/2023 PASSED BY THE PRL. DISTRICT AND SESSION JUDGE, UTTARA KANNADA, KARWAR FOR THE OFFENCE P/U/SEC. 465 OF IPC AND CONFIRM THE ACQUITTAL ORDER DAED 27.04.2023 IN C.C.NO. 217/2019 PASSED BY THE ADDL. SENIOR CIIVL JUDGE AND JMFC KARWAR FOR OFFENCE P/U/SECTIONS 468, 471, AND 420 OF IPC. MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Date: 2025.04.08 11:08:07 +0530 - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:5984 CRL.RP No. 100120 of 2025 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ORDERS, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Memo filed. Memo reads as under: “The counsel for the Petitioner most respectively submits that the Counsel for petitioner have wrongly filed Criminal Revision Petition instead to criminal Appeal wherein conviction is under challenge. Hence same may be dismissed as withdrawn with a liberty to file criminal appeal in interest of justice and equity.” 2. Placing the memo on record, revision petition is dismissed as withdrawn with liberty as prayed for. 3. The time spent before this Court, in this revision petition shall be excluded for computing the period of limitation under Section 14 of the Limitation Act. SD/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE HMB CT:PA List No.: 2 Sl No.: 6