Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50449 (AP)

Chowdari Narayana Murthy @ Babji, v. The State of Andhra Pradesh,

WP/7665/2021 · 2025-10-05

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010133682021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 7665/2021 Between: 1. CHOWDARI NARAYANA MURTHY @ BABJI,, S/O. LATE SATYANARAYANA, AGED 63 YEARS. 2. GONTI NARASINGA RAO,, S/O. JAMMAYYA, AGED ABOUT 34 YEARS, R/C YADAVA STREET, SHER MAHAMMADPURAM (S M PURAM) VILLAGE, ETCHERLA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 3. CHOWDARI AVINASH,, S/O. NARAYANA MURTHY @ BABJI, AGED 32 YEARS, ALL ARE RESIDENTS OF SHER MAHAMMADPURAM (S M PURAM) VILLAGE, ETCHERLA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, REPRESENTED BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY. 2. SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT, SRIKAKULAM. 3. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, SRIKAKULAM SUB DIVISION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 4. INSPECTOR OF POLICE, J.R.PURAM CIRCLE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 5. SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ETCHERLA POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 6. V CHANDRASEKHAR, INSPECTOR OF POLICE, J.R.PURAM CIRCLE, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 7. SRI GANDAPU RAJESH, SUB INSPECTOR OF POLICE, ETCHERLA POLICE STATION, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. 8. KOONA SURYA RAO, S/O LATE CHINNA APPAYYA, AGED. 52 YEARS, SARPANCH SHER MAHAMMADPURAM (S M PURAM) VILLAGE, ETCHERLA MANDAL, SRIKAKULAM DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. GINJUPALLI SUBBA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 2. S R SANKU AND KAVITI MURALI KRISHNA The Court made the following: ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “.... to issue an appropriate Writ, Order or Direction more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the repondents 4 to 8 in interfering with the administration and conduct of the affairs of Sri Sri Sri Kodanda Ramalayam situated in Sher Mahammadpuram (SM Puram) Village, Etcherla Mandal, Srikakulam District, as illegal, arbitrary and in violation of Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents not to interfere with the administration and conduct of the affairs of Sri Sri Sri Kodanda Ramalayam and to pass .” 2. Heard Sri G.Subba Rao, learned counsel for the petitioners and Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home. 3. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:06.10.2025 ASR 3 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.7665 of 2021 Dt.06.10.2025 Asr