Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50446 (KAR)

THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER v. BASANAGOUDA S/O SHANKARGOUDA PATIL

WA/100197/2025 · 2025-04-26

Lok Adalath

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

HIGH COURT LEGAL SERVICES COMMITTEE, DHARWAD BENCH BEFORE THE LOK ADALATH IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 CONCILIATORS PRESENT: HON’BLE MR.JUSTICE UMESH M ADIGA AND SMT. SHAILA BELLIKATTI, MEMBER W.A.No.100197/2025 (L-KSRTC) (Lok Adalat No.370/2025) BETWEEN: THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NWKRTC, BELAGAVI DIVISION, REP. BY ITS DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NWKRTC, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI. ...APPELLANT (BY SRI. PRASHANT S. HOSMANI, ADVOCATE) AND BASANAGOUDA S/O. SHANKARGOUDA PATIL, AGE 40 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O. KESARAKOPPA, TQ. RAMADURGA, DIST. BELAGAVI-590001. RESPONDENT (BY SRI. A. M. PATIL, ADVOCATE) THIS WRIT APPEAL IS FILED U/S.4 OF KARNATAKA HIGH COURT ACT, 1961, PRAYING TO SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 25-04-2024 IN WP NO.100878/2017 (L-KSRTC) PASSED BY THE LEARNED SINGLE JUDGE OF THIS HON’BLE IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE AND EQUITY. 2 THE APPEAL BEING REFERRED TO LOK ADALAT, COMING ON FOR CONCILIATION, THIS DAY, THE LOK ADALAT PASSED THE FOLLOWING: CONCILIATION ORDER 1. The Chief Law Officer of NWKRTC, the respondent-workman and advocate for the appellant and respondent are present. 2. After prolonged negotiation, the matter is settled and the advocates appearing for both the parties have filed a joint memo of settlement. 3. In view of the joint memo of settlement, Writ Appeal is disposed off. The order passed by the Labour Court, Belagavi in KID No.65/2013 dated 08.11.2016 is modified. Sd/- JUDGE Sd/- MEMBER KGK /CT-AN 3 4