1 (WPS No. 3150 of 2017) 2025:CGHC:30619 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 3150 of 2017 1 - Anoop Kumar Shukla S/o Late Shri Dinesh Prasad Shukla, Aged About 57 Years Occupation Government Service, Presently Posted And Working As Assistant Grade - II In The Office Of The Divisional Joint Director Of Health Service, Surguja Division, Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh --- Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Department Of Health And Family Welfare, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - Secretary, Department Of Finance, Department Of Finance, Mahanadi Mantralaya, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - Director Of Health Service, Chhattisgarh Indrawati Bhawan, 3rd Floor, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - Director Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Chhattisgarh, Indrawati Bhawan, Naya Raipur, Post Office And Police Station Naya Raipur, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh 5 - Divisional Joint Director, Health Services, Surguja Division, Ambikapur, Chhattisgarh 6 - Divisional Divisional Joint Director, Treasury, Accounts And Pension, Ambikapur, Division Surguja, Chhattisgarh., Chhattisgarh --- Respondent(s) (Cause-title taken from the Case Information System) For Petitioner :- Mr. Chandresh Shrivastava, Advocate For State :- Mr. Sharad Mishra, Panel Lawyer ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Digitally signed by ADITI DIWAN KAIWART Date: 2025.07.07 10:38:39 +0530 2 (WPS No. 3150 of 2017) SB- Hon'ble Shri Justice Sanjay K. Agrawal Order On Board 04.07.2025 1. Heard. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that though the second time pay scale has been granted to the petitioner by the Civil Surgeon, Ambikapur/competent authority on 24.03.2015 (Annexure P/6), but the same has been declined by the Divisional Joint Director, Treasury Accounts and Pension, Ambikapur vide order dated 24.02.2016 (Annexure P/15). 3. Be that as it may, the petitioner is at liberty to file representation before the respondent No.1/competent authority for redressal of his grievance and the respondent No.1/competent authority is directed to consider and decide the said representation of the petitioner on its own merit strictly in accordance with law by passing a reasoned and speaking order within three months from the date of receipt of the said representation, as it is an internal dispute between the Department of Health and Department of Finance. 4. 4. With the aforesaid directions and without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case, this writ petition stands finally disposed of. Sd/- (Sanjay K. Agrawal) Judge @d!t!