Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50420 (KAR)

SMT BHARATI v. SHOBHA

RSA/100443/2024 · 2025-02-17

E S Indiresh

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, DHARWAD DATED THIS 17TH DAY OF FEBRUARY 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE E.S.INDIRESH RSA NO. 100443 OF 2024 (PAR/POS) BETWEEN: 1. SMT BHARATI W/O KRISHNA KHANNUKAR AGE 54 YEARS OCC HOUSEHOLD WORK & ANOTHER, ...APPELLANTS (BY SRI. SHREEVATSA HEGDE & ABHILASH HANAMANNAVAR ADVOCATES) AND: 1. SHOBHA W/O VASANT PATIL AGE 62 YEARS OCC HOUSEHOLD R/O. NEAR BHAIRAVNATH MANDIR MANGADEWADI, PUNE CITY STATE MAHARASHTRA-411046 & 9 OTHERS. RESPONDENTS RSA FILED UNDER SECTION 100 OF CPC, AGAINST THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE DATED 16.09.2023 PASSED IN R.A.NO.271/2019 ON THE FILE OF THE IX ADDITIONAL DISTRICT AND SESSIONS JUDGE, AND MEMBER ADDITIONAL MOTOR ACCIDENT CLAIMS TRIBUNAL, BELAGAVI, ALLOWING THE APPEAL AND SETTING ASIDE THE JUDGMENT AND DECREE 2 DATED 06.02.2019 PASSED IN O.S. NO.389/2015 ON THE FILE OF THE II ADDITIONAL SENIOR CIVIL JUDGE AND CHIEF JUDICIAL MAGISTRATE, BELAGAVI, DISMISSING THE SUIT FILED FOR PARTITION AND SEPARATE POSSESSION. THIS APPEAL COMING ON FOR ORDERS THIS DAY, THE COURT MADE THE FOLLOWING. O R D E R Finally, three weeks9 time is granted to comply with the office objections, failing which, the appeal shall be dismissed without reference to the Bench for non-prosecution. SD/- JUDGE Note :- As per endorsement made in the order sheet dated 26.03.2025 Advocates for the appellants has not complied with the office objections. Hence, this RSA No. 100443/2024 stands dismissed without reference to the Bench for non-prosecution as per the Court Order dated 17.02.2025. BY ORDER OF THE COURT Sd/- ASSISTANT REGISTRAR T- By : nth C- By: vk