PRAVEEN KUMAR BANSAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND ANOTHER
CRM-M/26078/2023 · 2025-09-15
Surya Partap Singh
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50418 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50418 (PNJ) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
207
In the High Court of Punjab and Haryana, at Chandigarh
Criminal Misc. No. M-26078 of 2023 Date of Decision: 15.09.2025 Praveen Kumar Bansal ... Petitioner(s) Versus State of Haryana and Others ... Respondent(s) CORAM: Hon'ble Mr. Justice Surya Partap Singh. Present: Mr. Tarun Singla and Mr. Rajinder Kumar Singla, Advocates for the petitioner(s). Ms. Deepali Verma, Assistant Advocate General, Haryana, for the respondents. Surya Partap Singh, J.
1. The learned counsel for the petitioner submits that FIR pertaining to the present petition has already been quashed. The learned counsel for the petitioner further submits that in view of above, the present petition has become infructuous, and that the same be dismissed as such.
2. In view of above, the present petition is hereby dismissed as having been rendered infructuous. (Surya Partap Singh) Judge September 15, 2025
“DK” Whether speaking/reasoned :Yes/No Whether reportable : Yes/No DEEPAK KUMAR BHARDWAJ 2025.09.16 11:53 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document