1 87ca1442.25 IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE OF BOMBAY BENCH AT AURANGABAD 87 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1442 OF 2025 IN AOST/1424/2025 WITH 88 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1444 OF 2025 IN AOST/341/2025 89 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1493 OF 2025 IN AOST/244/2025 90 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1526 OF 2025 IN AOST/347/2025 91 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1560 OF 2025 IN AOST/281/2025 92 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1567 OF 2025 IN AOST/238/2025 93 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1568 OF 2025 IN AOST/255/2025 94 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1572 OF 2025 IN AOST/234/2025 95 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1576 OF 2025 IN AOST/323/2025 96 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1579 OF 2025 IN AOST/314/2025 97 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1623 OF 2025 IN AOST/202/2025 98 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1627 OF 2025 IN AOST/212/2025 99 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1630 OF 2025 IN AOST/364/2025 100 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1637 OF 2025 IN AOST/286/2025 101 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1639 OF 2025 IN AOST/222/2025 102 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1643 OF 2025 IN AOST/271/2025 103 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1647 OF 2025 IN AOST/174/2025 104 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1649 OF 2025 IN AOST/353/2025 105 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1651 OF 2025 IN AOST/1467/2025 106 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1654 OF 2025 IN AOST/335/2025 107 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1658 OF 2025 IN AOST/1442/2025 123 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1446 OF 2025 IN AOST/330/2025 124 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1523 OF 2025 IN AOST/251/2025 125 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1634 OF 2025 IN AOST/209/2025 126 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1660 OF 2025 2 87ca1442.25 IN AOST/298/2025 127 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1662 OF 2025 IN AOST/182/2025 128 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1664 OF 2025 IN AOST/291/2025 129 CIVIL APPLICATION NO. 1667 OF 2025 IN AOST/361/2025 MAHENDRA AABASAHEB AMBHURE VERSUS JALNA ZILLA PARISHAD THRU. ITS CHIEF EXECUTIVE OFFICER AND OTHERS ... Advocate for Applicant : Mr. Amol Karbhari Gawali Advocate for Respondent No. 1 : Mr. P.D.Suryawanshi Advocate for Respondent No. 2 : Mr. S.H. Tripathi … CORAM : S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR, J. Dated : 28.03.2025 PER COURT :- ORDER ON DELAY CONDONATION APPLICATIONS : 1. Heard learned Advocate/s for respective parties. 2. Applicant/s seeks to condone delay caused in filing respective appeal/s respectively. Perused reasons as stated in the applications. Delay caused in filing appeal/s is duly explained. 3. Although learned Advocate/s appearing for respondents have orally opposed to condone delay, averments in applications are not controverted by filing affidavit-in-reply. 4. In that view of the matter a case is made out to condone delay. Hence applications are allowed. Delay stands condoned respectively. 5. Appeal/s be registered subject to removal of office objections. ( S. G. CHAPALGAONKAR ) JUDGE mahajansb/