Suryanarayana Varma Kanumuri, v. The State of A.P.
WP/2932/2022 · 2025-11-16
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
Transfer Petitionbody2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50408 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50408 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010042822022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] MONDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF NOVEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT HONOURABLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO. 2932/2022 Between:
SURYANARAYANA VARMA KANUMURI, S/O. LATE VENKATA RAMA RAJU, AGED 68 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 50-38-3, TPT COLONY, SEETHAMMADHARA, VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT
...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF A P, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY DEPARTMENT OF HOME, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMRAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT.
2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, VISAKHAPATNAM, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , VISAKHAPATNAM CITY, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
4. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, POLICE STATION, PARAWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM DISTRICT.
5. N C V RAJU, @ VARMA S/O VENKATA KRISHNAM RAJU, R/O RAMALAYAM STREET, MURAMALLA VILLAGE, I.POLAVARAM MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DIST.
6. NADIMIPALLI RAMALINGA RAJU, S/O N. SURAPA RAJU, AGED ABOUT 50 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O D.NO.7-48, OPP RAMALAYAM TEMPLE, CHEYYURU AGRAHARAM, CHEYYURU, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT.
7. BHUPATHIRAJU PULLAM RAJU, S/O LATE B. SUBRAMANYAM RAJU, AGED 34 YEARS, OCC BUSINESS, R/O FLAT NO. 304, ISV RESIDENCY, VADDIGUDEM, AMALAPURAM, E.G. DIST.
8. ESWARA RAO, , THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PARWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM
9. RAMESH, , THE SUB-INSPECTOR PARWADA, VISAKHAPATNAM
...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. N SUBBA RAO
2
Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following:
ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“.... a Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents more particularly respondent No 4 in not conducting the investigation and not making any efforts to file the Charge Sheet in F I R No 303 of 2021 dt 0210 2021 of Parawadj Police Station Visakhapatnam City Visakhapatnam District is illegal arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of the Code of Criminal Procedure and consequently direct the respondents 2 to 4 to conduct the investigation and file the charge sheet in F I R No 303 of 2021 dt.02.10.2021 of Parawada Police Station Visakhapatnam City Visakhapatnam District and pass Prayer is amended as per C.O.dt.23/3/2022 in IA.No.2/2022.”
2. None represented for the Petitioner.
3. Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions dated 11.02.2022, would submit that the investigation in Crime No.303 of 2021 on the file of Parawada Police Station, Visakhapatnam City was almost completed except taking permission from the prosecution of the Land Grabbing Court to file a report before the concerned Principal District Court.
4. Recording the same, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no
order as to costs.
As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:17.11.2025 Dinesh
3
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.2932 of 2022
Dt.17.11.2025
Dinesh