Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50402 (PNJ)

RAVINDER KAUR AND ANOTHER v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/11730/2025 · 2025-05-15

Jagmohan Bansal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

` CWP-11730-2025 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 126 CWP-11730-2025 Date of Decision: 15.05.2025 Ravinder Kaur and another …Petitioners Versus State of Punjab and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Mr. Nitesh Singla, Advocate for the petitioners (through video conferencing) Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. The petitioners through instant petition under Articles 226/227 of the Constitution of India are seeking direction to respondents to extend the benefit of step up of pay at par with their juniors by removing anomaly in terms of order dated 22.08.2019 (Annexure P-5). 2. Learned counsel for the petitioners, at the outset, submits that grievance of the petitioners, at this stage, would be redressed if respondents are directed to decide their legal notice dated 20.11.2024 (Annexure P-7) in a time bound manner. 3. Mr. Aman Dhir, Deputy Advocate General, Punjab, who on advance notice is present in Court on behalf of the respondent-State, assures the Court that competent authority would look into grievance of the petitioners and legal notice dated 20.11.2024 (Annexure P-7) would be appropriately answered within three months from today. MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.15 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement. ` CWP-11730-2025 -2- 4. In the wake of statement of learned State counsel, the present petition stands disposed of. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 15.05.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.05.15 15:30 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement.