APHC010558132011 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] WEDNESDAY,THE THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13367/2011 Between: 1. KOMMU LINGANNA, S/O. YESURATNAM, BUSINESS, D.NO. 1-196D, S.C.COLONY, GADIVEMULA VILLAGE & MANDAL, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD 3 OTHERS, REP. BY THE DIRECTOR (MARKETING), CURRIMVSOY ROAD, T.B.NO. 688, BALLARD ESTATE,MUMBAI. 2. THE BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD, REP. BY THE REGIONAL MANAGER LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS (LPG), RANGANATHAN GARDENS, OFFICE AT 11TH MAIN ROAD, ANNNAGAR, CHENNAI-400 060. 3. THE BHARAT PETROLEUM CORPORATION LTD, REP. BY THE TERRITORY MANAGER LIQUEFIED PETROLEUM GAS (LPG) LPG BOTTLING PLANT & TERRITORY OFFICE, KM STONE NO. 217/6, N.H.7, NEAR LAXMIPURAM VILLAGE, KURNOOL DISTRICT. 4. KADIRIKOTA RAVI KIRAN, S/O. K.C.RAJANNA, H.NO. 12-204, YEMMIGANURU TOWN, KURNOOL DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased toto issue a writ, order or direction more particularly one in the 2 JS,J W.P.No.13367/2011 natureof Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondents in conducting the Draw on 31-08-2010 for selection of LGP Distributors under Rajiv Gandhi Grameen LPG Vitrak (RGGLV) Scheme in respect of Gadivemula Village Location, Kurnool District with ineligible candidate i.e. the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary, discriminatory and violative of Articles 14, 16, 19, 21 and 300-A of the Constitution of India and Set-aside the draw conducted on 31-08-2011 and consequently direct the respondents to appoint the petitioner as LPG Distributor in respect of Gadivemula Village Location, Kurnool District under Rajiv Gandhi Grameen LPG Vitrak (RGGLV) Scheme and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2011(WPMP 16217 OF 2011 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay of all further proceedings in pursuance of the draw conducted on 31-8- 2010 for selectio of LPG Distributors under Rajiv Gandhi Grameen LPG Vitrak (RGGLV) Scheme in respect of Gadivemula Village location, Kurnool District, pending disposal of the Writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. GANGISETTY RAJESWARA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. THOOM SRINIVAS 2. K RATHANGA PANI REDDY 3. V V SATISH 3 JS,J W.P.No.13367/2011 The Court made the following ORDER: Though the matter was adjourned on 12.11.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the learned counsel for the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on 26.11.2025. Even on that day there was no representation for the petitioner. Hence, the matter was listed today under the caption <for dismissal=. Today when the matter is called, there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested to prosecute the case. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed as non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 03.12.2025 RSD 4 JS,J W.P.No.13367/2011 61 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 13367/2011 Dated: 03.12.2025 RSD