APHC010477852024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] SATURDAY,THE TWENTIETH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24562/2024 Between: 1. SHAIK ABDULLA,, S/O LATE DASTAGIRI, AGED 38 YEARS, OCC CULTIVATION, R/O KRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE, H/O BUDAWADA VILLAGE, MARRIPADU MANDAL, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND 1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS. PRINCIPAL SECRETARY TO GOVERNMENT, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DIRECTOR GENERAL OF POLICE, ANDHRA PRADESH, VADDESWARAM, MANGALAGIRI. 3. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT, NELLORE. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR, MARRIPADU CIRCLE, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, MARRIPADU POLICE STATION, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. 6. K SRINIVASA RAO, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED YEARS, SUB-INSPECTOR OF POLICE MARRIPADU POLICE STATION, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. 7. SRINIVASULU, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED YEARS. HEAD CONSTABLE, MARRIPADU POLICE STATION, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. 8. PRASAD, S/O NOT KNOWN TO THE PETITIONER, AGED YEARS. CONSTABLE, MARRIPADU POLICE STATION, S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. 9. GONEGUNTIA KALEMMA, W/O PAKERAIAH, AGED 30 YEARS, R/O B.C. COLONY, KRISHNAPURAM VILLAGE, MARRIPADU MANDAL S.P.S.R. NELLORE DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 5th to 8th respondents in interfering in the Civil dispute between the petitioner and the 9th respondent and frequently calling the petitioner to the Police Station as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the 5th to 8th respondents not to interfere with the Civil dispute between he petitioner and 9th respondent and interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and unconstitutional and direct the 3rd respondent to produce General Dairy, CC footage of the Police Station IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the 5th to 8th respondents not to call the petitioner to the Police Station to settle the Civil disputes between the petitioner and 9th respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. DHANUNJAYA BARU Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME The Court made the following: THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24562/2024 ORDER:- This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: “…to issue a writ or writs or order or orders one more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus to declare the action of the 5th to 8th respondents in interfering in the Civil dispute between the petitioner and the 9th respondent and frequently calling the petitioner to the Police Station as illegal, arbitrary, unconstitutional and consequently direct the 5th to 8th respondents not to interfere with the Civil dispute between he petitioner and 9th respondent and interfere with the life and liberty of the petitioner as illegal, arbitrary, without jurisdiction and unconstitutional and direct the 3rd respondent to produce General Dairy, CC footage of the Police Station…” 2. Heard Sri Dhanunjaya Baru, learned counsel for the petitioner and Sri V.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents. 3. The Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on written instructions, would submit that based on the complaint lodged by Goneguntia Kalemma-9th respondent, the petitioner was called to the police station for enquiry. After conducting a preliminary enquiry, the police found that the subject matter is purely civil in nature and therefore no crime has been registered against the petitioner. He would further submit that the police are not interfering in the civil disputes between the parties. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that recording the same, the petition may be disposed of. 5. Recording the above said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. However, the police are directed not to interfere in the civil disputes between the parties except under due process of law. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA 20.12.2025 KKV Date: 20.12.2025. KKV HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 24562/2024 Dated.20.12.2025 KKV 74 HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH:: AMARAVATI MAIN CASE NO: WRIT PETITION NO: 24562/2024 PROCEEDING SHEET Sl. No. Date ORDER OFFICE NOTE 2. 20.12.2025 Dr.VJP,J The Writ Petition is disposed of. (Vide separate order) ________ Dr.VJP, J KKV