APHC010040942013 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2422 OF 2013 Revision filed under Section 397 r/w 401 of Cr.P.C, call for the entire records pertaining to order dated 30-07-2013 passed in CrI.MP.No. 213 of 2012 in C.C.No. 3 of 2011 on the file of the Court of the Special Judge for SPE & ACB cases, Vijayawada. Between: Ankam Srinadha Swamy, S/6. Late Seetha Rama Swamy, aged 51 years, R/o. Bheemavaram Town and Mandal, W.G.District. ...Petitioner/Accused AND State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the Standing Counsel and Special Public Prosecutor for ACB, High Court of Andhra Pradesh., Amaravathi. ...Respondent lA NO: 1 OF 2024 Between: State of Andhra Pradesh, represented by the Standing Counsel and Special Public Prosecutor for ACB, High Court of Andhra Pradesh., Amaravathi ...Vacate Petitioner/Respondent AND Ankam Srinadha Swamy, S/o. Late Seetha Rama Swamy, aged 51 years, R/o. Bheemavaram Town and Mandal, W.G.District. ... Respondent/Petitioner Petition under Section 482 & 528 of BNSS, 2023, praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to Vacate the Interim order dated. 20.12.2013 passed in CRLRC.No.2422of 2013. Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. P RAJKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: SRI. UDAYA BHASKARA RAO (SC FOR ACB&SPL PP) The Court made the following: APHC010040942013 / IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3521] MONDAY,THE THIRTIETH DAY OF JUNE TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 2422/2013 I Between: I ANKAM SRINADHA SWAMY, W.G.DT.,, S/0. LATE SEETHA RAMA R/0. BHEEMAVARAM TOWN AND MANDAL, SWAMY, W.G.DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND STATE OF AP REP SPL PP ACB HYD, represented by the Standing Counsel and Special Public Prosecutor for ACB, High Court of A.P., Hyderabad. ...RESPONDENT Counsel for the Petitioner: P RAJKUMAR Counsel for the Respondent: UDAYA BHASKARA RAO(SC FOR ACB&SPL PP) The Court made the following Order: The learned counsel for the petitioner and also the learned Standing Counsel submit that the Criminal Revision Case has become infructuous 2 Dr.YLR.J Crl.R.C.No.2422of2013 Dated 30.06.2025 inasmuch as the trial has already been commenced; the Criminal Revision Case has been filed challenging the dismissal of the discharge petition. 2. In view of the above submission, the Criminal Revision Case is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending shall stand closed. / Sd/- K TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// sectI^^fficer To, 1. The Special Judge for SPE & ACB cases, Vijayawada.(with records) 2. The Station House Officer, ACB, West Godavari District. 3. One CC t Sri. P Rajkumar, Advocate [OPUC] 4. One CC to Sri. Udaya Bhaskara Rao, (SC FOR ACB & SPL PP) [OPUC] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, Amaravathi. 6. Two CD Copies High Court of Andhra Pradesh at PR sree HIGH COURT DATED:30/06/2025 ORDER CRLRC 2422/2013 iat. DISMISSING THE CRLRC AS INFRUCTUOUS