Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50376 (AP)

Anukula Sowmya v. Anukula John

CRLRC/1528/2015 · 2025-05-04

Y Lakshmana Rao

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1528 OF 2015 Revision filed under Section 397 & 401 of Cr.P.C, Aggrieved by the orders passed in FCOP.No. 1517 of 2011 dated 19-02-2015 by dismissing the petition filed under section 125 of Cr.P.C by the Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam. Between; 1. Anukula Sowmya, D/o. Sri Anukula John, aged 16 years, (Anukula Sreya, D/o. Sri Anukula John, aged 13 years, (petitioners 1 & 2 being minors, represented by their mother and natural guardian, Smt.Anukula Santha Kumari, D/o.Sri Duppati Danial, aged 42 years, R/o. D.No. 49-35-21/A.N.G.Os. Colony, Pioneer Residency, Akkayyapalem-16) 2. ...Appellants / Petitioners AND 1. Anukula John, S/o. Esekial, Teacher, aged 47 years, Working at Peddypalem, M.P.E.P.School, R/o. Rajugari Beeddu, Payakaraopeta Village, Payakaraopeta PS., Limits, Visakhapatnam District. ...Respondents / Respondents 2. The State of Andhra Pradesh, rept. by the Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravathi, Nelapadu. BWf -r ...Respondents / Respondents Coiihsfel for the Petitioner :SRI. INENI VENKATA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent No.1 : M/s. MADHAVI PRIYA MANTENA Counsel for the Respondent No.2 : PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following: wi i*li «'■ m APHC010232062015 I IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) la □ [3521] I a mm MONDAY, THE FIFTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE Y. LAKSHMANA RAO CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 1528/2015 Between: ...PETITIONER(S) Anukula Sowmya and Others AND .„RESPONDENT(S) Anukula John and Others Counsel for the Petitioner(S): I 1. INENI VENKATA PRASAD Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR (AP) 2.MADHAV1 PRIYA MANTENA The Court made the following: ORDER: The report from the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Visakhapatnam, is received, wherein it is stated that the petitioner received permanent alimony. 2 Dr. YLR, J - _ ^ Crl.R.C.No.l528 of 2015 Dated 05.05.2025 ’• \ \ In view of the report of the Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, 2. N Visakhapatnam, which was submitted based on the report from the learned Judge, Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam. In view of the above, the revision case can be disposed of as 3. compromised. In the result, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of as 4. compromised. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel. Miscellaneous petitions, if any pending, shall stand closed. Sd/- K. TATA RAO DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SECTION OFFICER To 1. The Additional Family Court, Visakhapatnam.(with records) 2. The Secretary, District Legal Services Authority, Visakhapatnam. 3. One CC to Sri. Ineni Venkata Prasad, Advocate [OPUC] 3. One CC to Sri. Madhavi Priya Mantena, Advocate [OPUC] 4. Two CCs to Public Prosecutor, High Court of Andhra Pradesh [OUT] 5. The Section Officer, Criminal Section, High Court of Andhra Pradesh at Amaravathi. 6. Three CD Copies PR Cnr HIGH COURT DATED:05/05/2025 ORDER ANO(?i^ CRLRC.No.1528 Of 2015 s r A m 2025J o ^ . Current ejection DISPOSING THE REVISION AS COMPROMISED