HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - A No. - 15496 of 2023 Court No. - 52 HON'BLE MRS. MANJU RANI CHAUHAN, J. Heard Mr. Vijay Kumar Rai, learned counsel for the petitioner and Mr. Aditya Bhushan Singhal, learned counsel for the respondents and perused the record. The petitioner has preferred instant writ petition with the following prayer :- "(a) Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the respondents to ensure the payment of following dues of petitioner - (i) G.P.F. as Rs. 38,63,305/- (ii) Gratuity as Rs. 10,00,000/- (iii) Amount of leave Encashment of 300 days. (iv) Amount of G.I.S. (v) Arrear of dearness allowances. (vi) 9% interest upon all the dues from 01.02.2023 to its actual payment." Learned counsel for the petitioner submits that for ventilation of his grievances, the petitioner has approached the authority concerned/respondent no.2 by means of moving representations. However, despite the aforesaid, no heed has yet been paid, therefore, a direction may be issued to decide the claim of the petitioner, within Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Vijay Kumar Rai Counsel for Respondent(s) : Aditya Bhushan Singhal, Suresh Singh Shyam Narayan Rai .....Petitioner(s) Managing Director And 2 Others .....Respondent(s) stipulated period. Learned counsel for the respondents submits that punishment order has been passed, challenging which a writ petition is pending, therefore, the petitioner is not entitled for the relief as prayed. However, in case the petitioner moves a fresh application/representation before the competent authority/respondent no.2, the same shall be considered and decided in accordance with law. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case but without expressing any opinion on the merits of the case set up on behalf of the petitioner, the present writ petition is disposed of by providing that the petitioner may make a fresh application/representation, ventilating all his grievances, supported by such documents, as may be advised, before the authority concerned/respondent no.2 within three weeks from today along with a certified copy of this order. On such representation being made, the authorities concerned/respondent no.2 shall make all endeavours to consider and decide the same, strictly in accordance with law, by means of a reasoned and speaking order, after giving proper opportunity of hearing to the parties concerned, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of six weeks from the date of production of certified copy of this order, if there is no legal impediment. October 9, 2025 Kalp Nath Singh WRIA No. 15496 of 2023 2 (Mrs. Manju Rani Chauhan,J.) Digitally signed by :- KALP NATH SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad