Research › Search › Judgment

Gauhati High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 5037 (GAU)

Smti Tsering Drema Namsa v. The State of AP and 6 Others

WP(C)/570/2023 · 2025-01-19

Kalyan Rai Surana

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Page No.# 1/3 GAHC040016332023 THE GAUHATI HIGH COURT (HIGH COURT OF ASSAM, NAGALAND, MIZORAM AND ARUNACHAL PRADESH) (ITANAGAR BENCH) Case No. : WP(C)/570/2023 Smti Tsering Drema Namsa W/o Shri D.W Namsa (Nursing Officer) General Hospital Bomdila, P.O and P.S Bomdila, District West Kameng, Arunachal Pradesh. Mob. 8729933451 VERSUS The State of AP and 6 Others represented by Commissioner/Secretary Vigilance, Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh. 2:The Deputy commissioner-cum-District Vigilance Officer Age: 0 Occupation : West Kameng District Bomdila Arunachal Pradesh. 3:The Commissioner/Secretary Age: 0 Occupation : Health and Family Welfare Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar. 4:The Director Age: 0 Occupation : Health Services Naharlagun Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh. 5:The District Medical Officer Age: 0 Occupation : Page No.# 2/3 West Kameng District Bomdila Arunachal Pradesh. 6:The Secretary/Director Land Management Age: 0 Occupation : Govt. of Arunachal Pradesh Itanagar 7:The District Land Record and Settlement Officer Age: 0 Occupation : District West Kameng Bomdila Arunachal Pradesh Advocate for the Petitioner : Teli Ango, Minki Boje Advocate for the Respondent : GA (AP), SC(Land Management),Dugmar Kamduk,SC(Health),Taba Tagum BEFORE HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE KALYAN RAI SURANA ORDER Date : 20.01.2025 Mr. M. Boje, learned counsel for the petitioner submits that during the pendency of this writ petition, the Departmental Promotion Committee has been constituted for consideration of promotion of the petitioner to the next higher post. Accordingly, it is submitted that the writ petition has become infructuous. Accordingly, upon instructions, the learned counsel for the petitioner seeks to withdraw this writ petition with liberty to approach again, if so advised. Ms. R. Basar, learned Government Advocate for the State respondent, Mr. Page No.# 3/3 D. Kamduk, learned Standing Counsel for the Land Management Department and Mr. T. Tagum, learned Standing Counsel for the respondent Nos. 3, 4 & 5 are present. Accordingly, the matter stands disposed of on withdrawal with liberty, as prayed for. JUDGE Comparing Assistant