I IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAV THURSDAY. THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISIQNICASE NO: 499 OF 2025 Between; Ravoori Eswar Rao„ Surya Teja Traders D.No. 2-18, Gurunagar Colony Chittoor '.rt ...PETITIONER/RESPONDENT AND 1. Medisetti Venkata Rattaiabv.i^/o Koteswara Rao, Rep.by his Power of Attorney Holder Medisetti Venkata Ramana R/o D.No. 74-14-49, Ayyappa Nagar, Vijayawada-520007. 2. The State Of Andhra Pradesh, Rep By Its Public Prosecutor High Court Of Andhra Pradesh At Amaravati. ...RESPONDENT/PETITIONER Revision filed under Sectic^s.sp & 401 of Cr.PC., praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit^^cl in support of the Criminal Revision Case, the High Court may b^ pje^^ct to allow the present criminal revision petition and consequently set aside;the order dated 19- 03-2025 in CrI.M.P. No. 1362 of 2024 in C.C No. ,226 :of 2024 passed by Hon’ble II Special Magistrate at Vijayawada. r\c lA NO: 1 OF 207.1^ Petition under Section 528of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to stay the further proc^edips in C.C No. 226 of 2024 in Hon’ble II Special Magistrate at Vijayawada until the disposal of this revision. ■h' ■'V' f Counsel for the Petitioner: SRI. BASAVARAJU Counsel for the Respondent No.2: PUBLIC PROSECUTOR The Court made the following (DRDER : SAI PRANEETH (AP) 1 .;.s; ■rcBr'"- i-. f r »7:.‘: 7-. ■■ 7 APHC010192672025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) mi [3396] THURSDAY, THE FIRST DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL REVISION CASE NO: 499/2025 Between: Ravoori Eswar Rao, ...PETITIONER AND Medisetti Venkata Rattaiah and Others Counsel for the Petitioner: 1.BASAVARAJU SAI PRANEETH Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. PUBLIC PROSECUTOR ...RESPONDENT(S) 2. The Court made the following Order: This Criminal Revision Case has been filed against the order, dated 19.03.2025, passed in Crl.M.P.No.1362 of 2024 in C.C.No.226 of 2024 by the learned II Special Magistrate, Vijayawada. A private complaint was filed in CC No.226 of 2024 against the 2. petitioner herein for the offence punishable under Section 138 read with 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act (for short ‘the N.I.Act’). In the said CC, the respondent No.1 herein filed a petition in CrI.MP No.1362 of 2024, under section 294 Cr.P.C., to receive the enclosed document namely Pen drive along with certificate signed as per Section 65 B of the Indian Evidence Act for marking the same on his behalf after condoning the delay in filing. The said application was allowed on 19.03.2025, and delay in filing the electronic devices i.e. pen drive containing whats app 2 messages and call record along with certificate filed by the petitioner is condoned, considering the certificate filed as per Section 65 B of the Indian Evidence Act. Against the said order, the present revision has been preferred by the petitioner herein. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor representing the respondent No.2/State. Perused the 3. record. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner herein is facing the trial in C.C.No.226 of 2024 for the offence punishable under Section 138 read with 142 of the Negotiable Instruments Act and the learned Judge, though the certificate is in contravention of 65 B of the Indian Evidence Act, received such document and nothing is there to believe the authenticity of such document. On the other hand, learned Assistant Public Prosecutor would submit that Court may pass appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made and on perusal of the material placed on record, this Court is of the opinion that whatever the contentions raised in the present revision can be raised when the document is actually tendered into evidence before the trial Court. Hence, it is apposite to dispose of this revision giving liberty to the petitioner to raise all his grounds when the document is actually tendered 4. 5. 6. J into evidence and the learned trial Judge may take appropriate decision regarding their objections, according to law. Accordingly, the Criminal Revision Case is disposed of. As a sequel thereto, the miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending this Criminal Revision Case, shall stand closed. 7. in SD/- V. SATYANARAYANA DEPUTY REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// SE N OFFICER To, 1. The II Special Magistrate at Vijayawada, Krishna District. 2. One CC to SRI. BASAVARAJU SAI PRANEETH Advocate [OPUC] 3. Two CCs to The Public Prosecutor High Court of Andhra Pradesh Amaravati [OUT] ; ; 4. Three CD Copies „ I ! i dr V!;c;, i’ HIGH COURT DATED:01/05/2025 ORDER CRLRC.No.499 of 2025 t DISPOSEING THE CRIMINAL REVISION CASE "I- 5 j .i- W-. 'A