Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50368 (PNJ)

MIRNALINI v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND ORS.

CWP/2328/2008 · 2025-05-16

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 1118 Mirnalini State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. vide which claim of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds has been rejected. 2. submissions of written (S.E.) Patiala, dated 14.05.2008, wherein it has been stat petitioner does not no counter filed. 3. unable to establish contact with the petitioner. 4. revived by demonstrating that the 16.05.2025 parveen kumar IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Gaurav Sharma, Advocate, Mr. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the orders vide which claim of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate grounds has been rejected. Learned State counsel refers to paras 1 and 2 of preliminary submissions of written statement filed by the District Education Officer (S.E.) Patiala, dated 14.05.2008, wherein it has been stat does not fall within the definition of family, to which there was no counter filed. Learned counsel states that despite unable to establish contact with the petitioner. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it revived by demonstrating that the lis still subsists. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-2328-2008 (O & M) Date of decision: 16.05.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Advocate, for the petitioner. Satnam Preet Singh Chauhan, DAG, Punjab. Prayer made in the present petition is for quashing the orders vide which claim of the petitioner for appointment on compassionate Learned State counsel refers to paras 1 and 2 of preliminary statement filed by the District Education Officer (S.E.) Patiala, dated 14.05.2008, wherein it has been stated that the within the definition of family, to which there was Learned counsel states that despite best efforts, he is also unable to establish contact with the petitioner. Disposed of, reserving the petitioner with a liberty to get it still subsists. (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.05.16 17:46 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.