THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NWKRTC, v. ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER
WP/103823/2022 · 2025-09-16
Suraj Govindaraj
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50368 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50368 (KAR) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
- 1 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12205 WP No. 103823 of 2022
IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA,AT DHARWAD DATED THIS THE 16TH DAY OF SEPTEMBER, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ WRIT PETITION NO. 103823 OF 2022 (L-KSRTC) BETWEEN:
THE DIVISIONAL CONTROLLER, NWKRTC, SIRSI DIVISION, SIRSI, REPRESENTED BY ITS CHIEF LAW OFFICER, NWKRTC, CENTRAL OFFICE, GOKUL ROAD, HUBBALLI-580021. &PETITIONER (BY SRI PRASHANT S. HOSMANI, ADVOCATE)
AND:
1.
ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT (PGA) BELAGAVI DIVISION, BELAGAVI-580021.
2.
ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER, AND CONTROLLING AUTHORITY, THE PAYMENT OF GRATYUITY ACT, PGA, HUBBALLI, DHARWAD DIVISION DHARWAD-580001.
3.
UTTAM S/O SHYAMRAMAPPA PALANKAR AGE: 50 YEARS, OCC: NIL, R/O C/O M G SHET, AT POST HEGDE, KUMTA, DIST UTTARA KANNADA-580031. &RESPONDENTS
Digitally signed by GIRIJA A. BYAHATTI Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench, Dharwad
- 2 -
HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:12205 WP No. 103823 of 2022
THIS WRIT PETITION IS FILED UNDER ARTICLES 226 AND 227 OF THE CONSTITUTION OF INDIA, PRAYING TO ISSUE A WRIT OF CERTIORARI OR ANY OTHER APPROPRIATE WRIT
ORDER OR DIRECTION AND SET ASIDE THE ORDER DATED 28/03/2018 PASSED BY THE ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND APPELLATE AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT BELAGAVI IN 27/2017 BELAGAVI DATED 28/03/2018 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-A AND THE
ORDER PASSED BY IN ASSISTANT LABOUR COMMISSIONER AND CONTROLLING AUTHORITY UNDER THE PAYMENT OF GRATUITY ACT BELAGAVI IN -07/2010 BELAGAVI DATED 13/03/2014 PRODUCED AT ANNEXURE-B.
THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR DISMISSAL, THIS DAY,
ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER:
ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE SURAJ GOVINDARAJ)
1. Despite the order dated 11.08.2025 office objections have not been complied with.
2. It appears that the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the matter.
3. The petition is dismissed for non-prosecution.
Sd/- (SURAJ GOVINDARAJ) JUDGE GAB CT:GSM/List No.: 2 Sl No.: 19