APHC010536842023 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] MONDAY, THE TWENTY SECOND DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION No. 27937/2023 BETWEEN: 1. PEDAMALLI VENUGOPAL REDDY, S/o. VENKATA KRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/o. THUMMURU, NAIDUPET TOWN AND MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 2. YERRAM RAGHAVA REDDY, S/o. RAMAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 70 YEARS, R/o. H.No.2/33A, 2ND WARD, MEDARAMITLA VILLAGE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT. 3. SUDDAPALLI CHANDRA SEKHAR, S/o. SAMBASIVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/o. KONDAYAPALEM GATE, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 4. PEDAMALLI BHARATHI, W/o. VENUGOPAL REDDY, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/o. THUMMURU, NAIDUPET TOWN AND MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 5. KATTINA POLAIAH, S/o. PONDAIAH, AGED ABOUT 66 YEARS, R/o. PANDLURU VILLAGE, NAIDUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 6. ADALA MASTHAN REDDY, S/o PEDDA MASTHAN REDDY, AGED ABOUT 68 YEARS, R/o. JSQ D-1/2, ACE COLONY, GUKLBARGA, KARANATAKA STATE. 7. PEDAMALLI CHANDANA, W/o. PAVAN KUMAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 35 YEARS, R/o. THUMMURU, NAIDUPETA TOWN AND MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 8. MARRI SUDHAKAR, S/o. GURAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 36 YEARS, R/O VENGAMAMBAPURAM VILLAGE, NAIDUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 9. POTHULURU SYAMALA, W/o P.UDAYA BHASKAR REDDY, AGED ABOUT 55 YEARS, R/o. URJA NAGAR, QUARTER NO.C-76, JEEVRA PROJECT, KORDA DISTRICT, CHATTESGARB. 10. PONNAPU VINAY KUMAR, S/o. MASTHANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 22 YEARS, R/o VENGAMAMBAPURAM VILLAGE, NAIDUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 11. LODARI DASAIAH, S/o. RAMANAIAH, AGED ABOUT 47 YEARS, R/O VENGAMAMBAPURAM VILLAGE, NAIDUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 12. MARRI GURAVAIAH, S/O GURAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 62 YEARS, R/O VENGAMAMBAPURAM VILLAGE, NAIDUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 13. PERUVAYILA GOPALAIAH, S/O VENKAIAH, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O VENGAMAMBAPURAM VILLAGE, NAIDUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 14. MARRI GURUPRASAD, S/O GURAVAIAH, AGED ABOUT 40 YEARS, R/O VENGAMAMBAPURAM VILLAGE, NAIDUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 15. KODURU CHANDRA SEKHAR REDDY,, S/O BALAKRISHNA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 75 YEARS, R/O H.NO.24/2/148, SANTHI NAGAR, DARGAMITTA, NELLORE CITY, SPSR NELLORE DISTRICT. 16. DANDIGUNTA SRINIVASAMURTHY, S/O VENKATA CHALAPATHI RAO, AGED ABOUT 60 YEARS, R/O D.NO.5-3- 58, AGRAHARAMPETA, NAIDUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 17. DANDIGUNTA TEJA, S/O D.SRINIVASAMURTHY, AGED ABOUT 32 YEARS, R/O D.NO.5-3-58, AGRAHARAMPETA, NAIDUPET MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 18. KALKI PRATAP REDDY, S/O AUDISESHA REDDY, AGED ABOUT 54 YEARS, R/O RAJAGOPALAPURAM, NAIDUPETA TOWN AND MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 19. KALKI SUJANA, W/O PRATAP REDDY, AGED ABOUT 48 YEARS, R/O. RAJAGOPALAPURAM, NAIDUPETA TOWN AND MANDAL, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER(S) AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRL. SECRETARY, ROADS AND BUILDINGS DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DEPUTY EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, ROADS AND BUILDINGS, SUB-DIVISION, NAIDUPETA, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 3. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, TIRUPATHI, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. 4. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, SULLURPET, TIRUPATHI DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, order or direction more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the preliminary notification issued by the 3rd respondent under Section 11(1) of Act 30 of 2013 dated 25-2-2021 and 10-3-2021 and the award enquiry notice dated 30- 8-2023 issued by the 4th respondent as illegal, arbitrary and contrary to the provisions of Act 30 of 2013 and Consequently set aside the above notification issued by the 3rd respondent, and pass such other order or orders. Counsel for the Petitioner(S): 1. P GANGA RAMI REDDY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR ROADS BUILDINGS 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: ORDER: The present Writ Petition is filed questioning the notification issued by the 3rd respondent under Section 11(1) of Act 30 of 2013, dated 25.02.2021 and 10.03.2021 and the award enquiry notice dated 30.08.2023 issued by the 4th respondent. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that pending consideration of the Writ Petition, the respondent authorities have issued fresh notification under the aforesaid Act. Therefore, the present Writ Petition is rendered infructuous. 3. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHARA RAO Date: 22.12.2025 Harin 83 THE HON’BLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO W.P.No. 27937 OF 2023 Date: 22.12.2025 Harin