Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50366 (AP)

Kolla Srinivasu v. IDBI Bank,

WP/7910/2017 · 2025-12-07

Sumathi Jagadam

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010706932017 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3459] MONDAY, THE EIGHTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7910/2017 Between: 1. KOLLA SRINIVASU, S/O SATYANARAYANA, AGED ABOUT ... YEARS, OCC: AGRICULTURIST, RESIDENT OF D.NO.3-95, MAIN ROAD, GUMMULURU VILLAGE, AKIVIDU MANDAL, WEST GODAVARI DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. ...PETITIONER AND 1. IDBI BANK, DANAVAIPETA BRANCH, RAJ AHMAHENDRAVARAM, REP. BY ITS AUTHORIZED OFFICER. 2. THE EXECUTIVE DIRECTOR, IDBI TOWER, WTC COMPLEX, CUFFEE PARADE, MUMBAI. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue an appropriate Writ, order or Direction, more particularly in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the respondent in not acting in the spirit of settlement though the petitioner requested to settle his loan account under the one time settlement (OTS) proposal umpteen times pertaining to the Fish Tank Kissan Credit Card loan sanctioned to the petitioner vide sanction letter bearing account No. FT KCC 094655100000842 Dated 04-12-2009 and Account No. FT KCC 0094671200001984, dated 16- 03-2.011 as illegal, unjust, unconstitutional and against the procedures of law and against the principles of Natural Justice, while consequently to direct the respondents herein to consider the OTS proposal keeping in mind of the 2 JS, J W.P.No.7910 of 2017 natural calamities occurred in the year 2014 and to pass such other order or orders as the Hon'ble court may deem it fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case. IA NO: 1 OF 2017(WPMP 9754 OF 2017 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased to grant stay all further proceedings in pursuance of bearing loan account No. FT KCC 094655100000842 Dated 04-12-2009 and Account No. FT KCC 0094671200001984, dated 16-03-2.011 until pending disposal of main writ petition Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. ALMAS BEGUM MOHAMMED Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. B HARINATH RAO 3 JS, J W.P.No.7910 of 2017 The Court made the following Order: When the matter was listed on 16.10.2025, there was no representation on behalf of the petitioner. Therefore, the matter was directed to be listed on 01.12.2025. Even on that day as there was no representation for the petitioner, the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption “for dismissal”. 2. Today when the matter is called, again there is no representation for the petitioner. It appears that the learned counsel for the petitioner is not interested in prosecuting the case. 3. Therefore, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel, miscellaneous applications pending, if any, shall stand closed. __________________________________ JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM Dated: 08.12.2025 MSI 4 JS, J W.P.No.7910 of 2017 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE SUMATHI JAGADAM WRIT PETITION NO: 7910/2017 Dated: 08.12.2025 MSI