1 / 3 2025:CGHC:47199 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 4903 of 2025 Anil Chopra S/o Late Shivnarayan Chopra Aged About 63 Years R/o C-313, Priyadarshaniya Nagar, Near Santgyaneshwar School, P.S. New Rajendra Nagar, District Raipur, C.G. ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through Its Secretary, Department of Urban Administration & Development, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, C.G. 2 - Director Department of Town And Country Planning, Indrawati Bhawan, Nava Raipur, Atal Nagar, District- Raipur, C.G. 3 - Chief Medical and Health Officer Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. 4 - Commissioner Municipal Corporation, Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. 5 - Collector Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. 6 - M/s Sun And Sun Inframatrix Pvt. Mtd. Through Its Managing Director, Byron Bazar, Near Mahila Thana, Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. 7 - M/s Mosaic Infraventures Pvt. Ltd. Through Its Managing Director, Surya Land Developers, Satya Narayan Dharamshala Building, Station Road, Raipur, District- Raipur, C.G. 8 - M/s G.P.T. Healthcare Limited Through Its Authorized Representative, J.C.- 25, Sector- I I I, Salt Lake, Kolkata-700106 9 - I.L.S. Hospital Through Its Authorized Signatory, Amrapali Society, Panchpedi Naka, Near Sparsh Automobiles, District Raipur, C.G. ... Respondents ASHUTOSH MISHRA Digitally signed by ASHUTOSH MISHRA Date: 2025.09.16 18:40:55 +0530 2 / 3 For Petitioner : Mr. Vivek Ranjan Tiwari, Sr. Adv. along with Mr. Atul Kesharwani, Advocate For State : Mr. Anurag Tripathi, PL For Respondent No.4: Mr. Pankaj Agrawal, Advocate (Hon’ble Shri Justice Arvind Kumar Verma) Order on Board 15/09/2025 1. By way of the instant petition, the petitioner is challenging the in action of the respondent authorities in not deciding the complaints of the petitioner regarding running a Hospital namely ILS Hospital by the respondent No.8 without obtaining any permission for the same from the respondent authorities. 2. At this juncture, learned counsel for the petitioner would confine his prayer to the extent that the respondent authorities may be directed to decide the complaint of the petitioner dated 29/08/2023 (Annexure P/2) within a stipulated time period. 3. Learned State counsel would submit that they have no objection in deciding the complaint of the petitioner dated 29/08/2023. 4. I have heard learned counsel for the parties and perused the documents. 5. Considering the entire facts and circumstances of the case and the limited prayer made by learned counsel for the petitioner coupled with the no objection given by the State counsel, it is directed that Respondent No.4 shall decide the complaint of the petitioner dated 29/08/2023 (Annexure P/2) expeditiously as early as possible, if not 3 / 3 decided already, in accordance with law. 6. It is made clear that this Court has not expressed any opinion on the merits of the case and the respondent authorities shall be at liberty to decide the complaint on its own merits. 7. With the aforesaid observation, the instant writ petition stands disposed of. SD/- SD/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) JUDGE ashu