` CWP-11786-2024 -1- IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 203 CWP-11786-2024 Date of Decision: 02.07.2025 Surender Kumar …Petitioner Versus Union Territory, Chandigarh and others …Respondents CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE JAGMOHAN BANSAL Present: - Ms. Deepali Verma, Advocate for the petitioner Mr. Sumeet Jain, Advocate and Mr. Arav Gupta, Advocate for respondent Nos.1 to 4 Mr. Sanjiv Ghai, Advocate for respondent No.5 *** JAGMOHAN BANSAL, J. (Oral) 1. Learned counsel for respondent Nos.1 to 4, at the outset, submits that the petitioner, on attaining the age of superannuation, has retired, thus, instant petition has rendered infructuous. 2. Learned counsel for the petitioner does not dispute the aforesaid factual position. 3. In the wake of statement of both sides, the present petition stands dismissed as infructuous. (JAGMOHAN BANSAL) JUDGE 02.07.2025 Mohit Kumar Whether speaking/reasoned Yes/No Whether reportable Yes/No MOHIT KUMAR 2025.07.02 16:27 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgement.