Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50346 (AP)

GORANTLA RAJESH BABU v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH

WP/20546/2024 · 2025-12-22

V Sujatha

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010402642024 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3333] TUESDAY,THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 20546/2024 Between: 1. GORANTLA RAJESH BABU, S/O. RANGANAYAKULU, AGED 51 YEARS, R/O. D. NO. 3-74, GANDHI NAGAR BAZAR, KARAMCHEDU (V AND M), PRAKASAM DISTRICT-523168. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, WATER RESOURCES DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT OF FINANCE AND PLANNING, SECRETARIAT BUILDINGS, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 3. THE MANAGING DIRECTOR, ANDHRA PRADESH STATE IRRIGATION DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, AMMANA ESTATES, PRAKASAM ROAD, GOVERNORPET, VIJAYAWADA. 4. THE COLLECTOR AND DISTRICT MAGISTRATE, PRAKASAM DISTRICT, ONGOLE. 5. THE SUPERINTENDING ENGINEER, A.P.S.I.D.C CIRCLE, KADAPA. 6. THE EXECUTIVE ENGINEER, A.P.S.I.D.C DIVISION, ONGOLE. 2 VS,J W.P.NO.20546 OF 2024 7. THE PAY AND ACCOUNTS OFFICER, WORKS AND ACCOUNTS, NSP PELLURU COLONY, NEAR NAGARJUNA UNIVERSITY, ONGOLE. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in withholding the deposits payments of Rs. 12,78,935/- (Rupees Twelve Lakhs Seventy-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred and Thirty-Five Only) for the works executed by the petitioner as bad, illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust and against the Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the deposits amounts of Rs. 12,78,935/- (Rupees Twelve Lakhs Seventy-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred and Thirty-Five Only) payable to the petitioner for the works executed by the petitioner and pass such IA NO: 1 OF 2024 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. BANDLA PAVAN Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR IRRI AND CAD 2. MALLIPUDI DHANA RAJU SC for APIDC Ltd. 3. GP FOR FINANCE PLANNING The Court made the following: 3 VS,J W.P.NO.20546 OF 2024 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 20546/2024 ORDER:- This writ petition is filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India seeking the following relief: “….to issue a writ order or direction, more particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the respondents in withholding the deposits payments of Rs.12,78,935/- (Rupees Twelve Lakhs Seventy-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred and Thirty-Five Only) for the works executed by the petitioner as bad, illegal, arbitrary, improper, unjust and against the Article 21 of Constitution of India and consequently direct the respondents to pay the deposits amounts of Rs.12,78,935/- (Rupees Twelve Lakhs Seventy-Eight Thousand Nine Hundred and Thirty-Five Only) payable to the petitioner for the works executed by the petitioner.” 2. The petitioner is a civil contractor who has been executing works for various Government Departments, including the R & B and Panchayat Raj Departments. The respondents entrusted certain works to the petitioner under valid agreements. The petitioner completed the said works within the stipulated contract period and strictly in accordance with the terms and conditions of the agreements. The completed works were duly recorded in the Measurement Books. However, despite satisfactory completion of the works, the respondents have withheld the deposit amounts aggregating to Rs.12,78,935/-, which are payable to the petitioner in respect of the works executed by him. 3. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner as well as learned Assistant Government Pleader for Irrigation appearing for the respondents. 4 VS,J W.P.NO.20546 OF 2024 4. The 6th respondent has filed a memo on 15.12.2025, duly admitting the fact that the petitioner has completed six lift irrigation scheme works, including the revival of Boddulurivaripalem-2 Lift Irrigation Scheme. The deposit (FSD) bill amount was paid to agency through CFMS Portal vide token No.2025-487297 for Rs.2,10,253/- on 30.09.2025. But however, with regard to the payment of other five works, it is stated that the same are to be uploaded in Nidhi Portal, and after receipt of necessary permission for release of the deposit from the APSIDC Circle Office, Guntur, process will be initiated for uploading of deposits for the remaining five works. 5. As the amount payable to the petitioner is admitted, there shall be a direction to the respondents to clear the bills, excluding the amount already paid to the petitioner to a tune of Rs.2,10,253/-, as expeditiously as possible, preferably within a period of four (04) weeks from the date of receipt of copy of this order. 6. With the above direction, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Consequently, Miscellaneous Petitions, if any, pending in this Writ Petition shall stand closed. ____________________ JUSTICE V.SUJATHA Date :23.12.2025 JLV 5 VS,J W.P.NO.20546 OF 2024 182 THE HONOURABLE SMT JUSTICE V.SUJATHA WRIT PETITION NO: 20546/2024 Dt.23.12.2025 JLV