[3396 ] IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH (Special Original Jurisdiction) TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPa" '^ WRIT PETITION NO: 14309 OF 2niQ AMARAVATI Between: 1. Bachu Malyadri, S/o. Narasimharn Government High School. Myanampadu, S.N. Padu Mandal District. Aged about 45 years, R/o. , Prakasarri 2. Yarragolla Girl Babu Yadav, S/o. Yarragolla Ramamurthy, Aged 41 years, R/o. H. No. 85/9, Pathagoiiapalli Village, Masapeta Mandal, Kadapa District. •; 3. U Ramanaiah, S/o. Venkata Teacher, Kurnool, Kurnool District. about Swamy, Aged about 47 years, Occ 4. Y Aswartha Narayana, S/o. Y; S. Maruthi Kumar, Occ Teacher, Ananthapur, Ananthapur District. 5. J Madhavi, D/o. J Venkata Rao, Aged about Vishakhapatnam .Vishakhapatnam District. 6. Puppala Venkata Bhaskara Rao, S/o. Aged about 57 years 48 years, Occ Teacher, Rama Chandra Rao, Aged about 50 years, Occ Teacher, Vishakhapatnam, Vishakhapatnam 7. K Kondayya, S/o. Kondayya, Aged Nellore, Nellore District. District, about 47 years, Occ Teacher, ...Petitioner AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Principal Secretary, School Education Department, Secretariat Buildings, Velagapudi, Amaravathi, Guntur. 2. The Commissioner of School Education, Sri Anjaneya Towers, Road Floor, N.T.T.P.S. Road, Ibrahimpatnam No. 7-104, B-Block, 4*^ Vijayawada. 3. The Regional Joint Director of School Godavari District. 4. The Regional Joint Director Kadapa District. 5. The Regional Joint Director District. 6. The Regional Joint Director Vishakhapatnam District. Education, Kakinada, East of School Education, Kadapa, Y.S.R. of School Education, Guntur, Guntur of School Education, Vishakhapatnam, ...Respondents Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution that in the circumstances ; Court may be pleased to i of India is filed praying stated in the affidavit filed therewith the High 'ssue appropriate writ, order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus the 2 declaring the action of nd respondent issued the notification for conduct of the inviting No. ESE02- 29.08.2019 is illegal arbitrary violation of of Constitution Of India applications for computer based test (CBT) vide RC 31021/96/2018-SCERT dated natural justice Article 14, 16 and 21 consequently set aside the same forthwith. lA NO: 1 OF 201Q Petition under Section 151 CPC is filed praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed i Court may be pleased to m support of the petition, the High suspend notification issued by the 2 issued the notification for conduct of nd respondent the inviting applications for computer No. ESE02-31021/96/2018-SCERT based test (CBT) vide RC 29.08.2019. dated Counsel for the Petitioners Counsel for the Respondents : The Court made the following: : SRI. PRAKASH C GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION APHC010308752019 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] 'A TUESDAY, THE SIXTH DAY OF MAY TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT the honourable dr justice VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION No. 14309/2019 f Between: Bachu Malyadri, and Others ...PETITIONER(S) AND The State Of Andhra Pradesh and Others Counsel for the Petitloner(S): 1 PRAKASH c Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1 GP for school education (AP) 2GP for services I (AP) RESPONDENT(S) The Court made the following: ORDER- The instant Writ Petition is filed by the Petitioners seeking indulgence of this Court under Article 226 of the Constitution of India for the following relief: « to issue appropriate writ order or direction particularly one in the nature of Writ of Mandamus declaring the action of the 2""' respondent issued the notification for conduct of the inviting applications for computer based test CbT vide RC.No.ESE0231021/96/2018SCERT dated 29.08.2019 is illegal, arbitrary, violation of natural justice Articles 14, 16 and 21 of Constitution Of India and consequently, set aside the same forthwith." 2. The earlier Docket Proceedings would show that none represented for the Petitioners and the matter was directed to be listed today under the caption "For Dismissal". 3. Despite the matter being listed under the caption "For dismissal", none represented for the Petitioners today. 4. Learned Government Pleader for Services-I is in attendance. 2 5. In that view, the Writ Petition is dismissed for non-prosecution. No order as to costs. Pending applications, if any, shall stand closed. x Sd/- U. SRIDEVI ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY/ \ SECTION OFFICER To, 1. One CC to SRI. PRAKASH C Advocate [OPUC] 2. Two CCs to GP FOR SCHOOL EDUCATION, Pradesh. [OUT] High Court Of Andhra 3. Three CD Copies KSR I HIGH COURT \ \ DATED:06/05/2025 ORDER WP.No.14309 of 2019 I ?l! SEP 2025 g); . Current iseciion » SagfgPATCH^^- DISMISSING THE WRIT PETITION WITHOUT COSTS