Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50327 (KAR)

SMT CHINNAVVA W/O BASAVARAJ KAPPALAGUDDI v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.RP/100480/2022 · 2025-04-26

V Srishananda

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6943 CRL.RP No. 100480 of 2022 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 26TH DAY OF APRIL, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION NO.100480 OF 2022 (397(Cr.PC)/438(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SMT. CHINNAVVA W/O. BASAVARAJ KAPPALAGUDDI, AGE: 59 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEHOLD, R/O. KALLOLI, TQ. MUDALAGI, DIST. BELAGAVI. 2. SHRI NEELAKANT BASAVARAJ KAPPALAGUDDI AGE: 30 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE, R/O. KALLOLI, TQ. GOKAK, DIST. BELAGAVI. …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. S.S. CHALAWADI, ADVOCATE FOR SRI. SHARANABASAVARAJ C. AND SRI. KUSHAL N. KAMBLE, ADVOCATE) AND: THE STATE OF KARNATAKA R/BY. PSI MAHILA STATION, R/BY. S.P.P. HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH, AT DHARWAD. …RESPONDENT (BY SRI. PRAVEENA Y. DEVAREDDIYAVARA, HCGP) THIS CRIMINAL REVISION PETITION IS FILED UNDER SECTION 397 AND 401 OF CR.P.C. SEEKING THAT CALL UPON THE RECORDS OF THE TRIAL COURT IN CC NO. 807/2017 ON THE FILE OF JMFC SECOND COURT, BELAGAVI AND THAT THE IMPUGNED ORDER PASSED ON 22.08.2022 IN C.C.NO. 807/2017 ON THE FILE OF JMFC SECOND COURT BELAGAVI BE SET ASIDE AND PETITIONERS/ACCUSED NO. 1 AND 4 BE DISCHARGED IN C.C.NO.807/2017 WHICH IS REGISTERED FOR THE OFFENCES PUNISHABLE UNDER SECTIONS 498A, 323, 504, 506 R/W. 34 OF IPC AND SECTION 3 AND 4 OF DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT. Digitally signed by MALLIKARJUN RUDRAYYA KALMATH Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - NC: 2025:KHC-D:6943 CRL.RP No. 100480 of 2022 THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR HEARING, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE V.SRISHANANDA) Learned counsel for the petitioners files a memo. Memo reads as under: “The Counsel for the petitioner is herewith producing the Compromise decree between the Petitioners and Respondents. Hence, same may be taken on record in the interest of justice and equity.” Placing the memo on record, petition stands disposed off. Sd/- (V.SRISHANANDA) JUDGE AC CT:PA List No.: 2 Sl No.: 31