1 2025:CGHC:52035 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPC No. 5535 of 2025 Dinesh Gupta S/o Brijmohan Aged About 46 Years R/o Village- Ropakhar, Tahsil Mainpat, District- Sarguja (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State Of Chhattisgarh Through Secretary, Department Of Revenue And Disaster Management, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nava Raipur, Distt. Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - Commissioner Sarguja Division, Distt. Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 3 -Collector Sarguja, Distt. Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 4 - Sub-Divisional Officer Sitapur, Distt. Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. 5 - Tahsildar Tahsil Mainpat, Distt. Sarguja, Chhattisgarh. ---- Respondents ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- For Petitioner : Mr. Ashish Shrivastava, Sr. Advocate with Mr. Rishab Gupta & Mr. Sourabh Sahu, Advocate. For Respondent-State : Mr. Satish Gupta, GA. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Hon'ble Shri Arvind Kumar Verma, Judge Order on Board 17.10.2025 1. Petitioner has filed this writ petition with following reliefs: 2 “10.1 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the Notice dated 09/10/2025, Bearing No.55/Vachak/Tah./2024, issued by the respondent no.5. 10.2 That this Hon ble Court may kindly be pleased to quash the order dated 09/10/2025, passed in the Revenue Case No.202508020800004, passed by the respondent no.5. 10.3 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to command and direct the respondent authorities to grant lease of 0.0416 hectare land of Khasra No.688, situated at Village Ropakhar, Tahsil Mainpat, District Sarguja (C.G.) to the petitioner. 10.4 Any other relief(s)/order(s)/direction(s) in favour of petitioner, which this Hon'ble Court may deem fit and proper in the facts and circumstances of the case, in the interest of justice. 10.5 Cost of the petition.” 2. Learned Senior counsel appearing for the petitioner submits that this writ petition may be disposed of with a direction to the concerned respondent-authority to consider and decide the pending application/representation of the petitioner Annexure P-3, within any specified time frame in accordance with law/rules. 3. Learned counsel appearing for the respondents/State submits that he is having no objection to the limited prayer made by counsel for the petitioner. 4. Heard learned counsel for the parties. 5. Considering facts of the case, nature of relief, submissions of counsel for the parties, this writ petition is disposed of at this stage directing the concerned respondent-authority to consider and 3 decide the pending application/representation of the petitioner Annexure P-3 in accordance with relevant rule/law/regulation preferably within an outer limit of ‘03 months’ from the date of receipt of this order. 6. Till decision on petitioner’s pending application/representation, no coercive steps shall be taken against him. CC as per rules. Sd/- Sd/- (Arvind Kumar Verma) Judge J/-