Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50322 (PNJ)

ABHAY JOSAN v. STATE OF PUNJAB AND OTHERS

CWP/11802/2025 · 2025-04-29

Aman Chaudhary

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

]IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT 137 Abhay Josan State of Punjab CORAM: HON Present : AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) 1. present petition, a representation dated 22.04.2025, Annexure P been submitted, which instructions from the petitioner, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. 2. merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation period of 8 weeks. 29.04.2025 parveen kumar Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Josan Versus f Punjab and Others CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Amar Jeet, Advocate, for the petitioner. Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. AMAN CHAUDHARY, J. (ORAL) Learned counsel states that regarding the claim raised in the present petition, a representation dated 22.04.2025, Annexure P been submitted, which has yet not evoked any response. He, thus, on instructions from the petitioner, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned State counsel has no objection. In view of the above and without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation period of 8 weeks. Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes / No Whether reportable : Yes / No IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB & HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH CWP-11802-2025 (O & M) Date of decision: 29.04.2025 ....Petitioner ...Respondents BLE MR. JUSTICE AMAN CHAUDHARY Mr. Swapan Shorey, DAG, Punjab. ounsel states that regarding the claim raised in the present petition, a representation dated 22.04.2025, Annexure P-5, has has yet not evoked any response. He, thus, on instructions from the petitioner, prays that a direction may be given to the respondents to decide the same in a time bound manner, to which learned without commenting upon the merits of the case, this petition is hereby disposed of with a direction to the respondents to decide the representation dated 22.04.2025, within a (AMAN CHAUDHARY) JUDGE PARVEEN KUMAR 2025.04.29 17:29 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this order/judgment.