Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Andhra Pradesh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50322 (AP)

Smt.K.Aruna Kumari v. The State of Andhra Pradesh

WP/8604/2021 · 2025-10-15

Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

APHC010146452021 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] THURSDAY,THE SIXTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8604/2021 Between: 1. SMT.K.ARUNA KUMARI, W/O RAJU AGE.38 YEARS, OCC. HOUSEWIFE R/O H.NO.1-258, KUNCHAPARTHI, VEMSOOR MANDAL, KHAMMAM DIST. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, HOME DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT BUILDING, VELAGAPUDI GUNTUR DIST. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, KRISHNA DIST., AT MACHILIPATNAM. 3. THE DEPUTY SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, NUZVID DIVISION, KRISHNA DIST. 4. THE CIRCLE INSPECTOR OF POLICE, MYLAVARAM CIRCLE OFFICER MYLAVARAM VILLAGE AND MANDAL KRISHNA DIST. 5. THE STATION HOUSE OFFICER, REDDIGUDEM PS, KRISHNA DIST. 6. KONDAPALLI KONDALA RAO, S/O. RAMAKOTAIAH AGE.55 YEARS, OCC. AGRICULTURE R/O KAPULA BAZAR, REDDIGUDEM VILLAGE AND MANDAL KRISHNA DIST. 7. KONDAPALLI RAMU RAMAKRISHNA, S/O KONDALA RAO, AGE.34 YEARS, R/O KAPULA BAZAR, REDDIGUDEM VILLAGE AND MANDAL, KRISHNA DIST. 2 ...RESPONDENT(S): Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. M M M SRINIVASA RAO Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR HOME 3 THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8604 of 2021 ORDER: This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for: <…to issue Writ or Direction preferably Writ of Mandamus, declaring the action of the Respondents No.2 to 5 in not considering and disposing the representation dt.5-1-2021 sent through registered post against the illegal attempts made by the respondents 6 and 7 in stealing the construction material and threatening the danger to the petitioner's life as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of Article 14 and 21 of the Constitution of India and consequently direct the Respondent no. 2 to 5 to take necessary steps pursuant to the complaint filed by the petitioner and pass.…= 2. When the matter was taken up for hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petition may be disposed of, since the relief has become infructuous in this matter. 3. Sri V.Farook, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home for the respondents is in attendance. 4. Recording the above said submission, the Writ Petition is dismissed as infructuous. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. _________________________________________ Dr. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date: 16.10.2025. UPS 4 HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA W.P.No.8604 of 2021 Dated.16.10.2025 UPS 173