APHC010610552025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3208] WEDNESDAY, THE TENTH DAY OF DECEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO: 31645/2025 Between: 1. DULAM VEERA ADI VINAY KUMAR, S/O NAGESWARARAO AGED ABOUT 46 YEARS, OCC- BUSINESS, R/O 8-104 NEAR SANTA MARKET, KAIKALURU, KRISHNA DISTRICT - 521333. ...PETITIONER AND 1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP. BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, AP SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, ELURU DISTRICT. ANDHRA PRADESH. 3. THE DISTRICT PANCHAYAT OFFICER, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 4. THE MANDAL REVENUE OFFICER, KAIKALURU MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. THE KAIKALURU GRAM PANCHAYAT, REP. BY ITS PANCHAYAT SECRETARY, KAIKALURU VILLAGE AND MANDAL, ELURU DISTRICT ...RESPONDENT(S): 2 Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased to issue a Writ, Order or direction more particularly one in the nature of WRIT OF MANDAMUS declaring the action of the Respondents in not taking any action to remove the encroachments in the government land in R.S, No. 488 of Kaikuluru Village and Mandal as illegal, arbitrary, and violative of principles of natural justice and consequently direct the respondents to take action and remove the encroachments in the said government land by following the due process of law and to pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased pleased to direct the Respondents to implement necessary steps to ensure the removal of the encroachments in the government land extent in R.S. No. 488 of Kaikaluru Village and Mandal, and to pass Counsel for the Petitioner: 1. K V ADITYA CHOWDARY Counsel for the Respondent(S): 1. GP FOR PANCHAYAT RAJ RURAL DEV 2. GP FOR REVENUE The Court made the following: 3 ORDER: During the course of hearing, learned counsel for the petitioner requested the Court to grant permission to withdraw the Writ Petition with a liberty to file Writ Petition afresh. Permission is accorded. Accordingly, the Writ Petition is dismissed as withdrawn granting liberty to file Writ Petition afresh. No costs. As a sequel thereto, interlocutory applications pending, if any, in the writ petition, shall also stand closed. __________________ JUSTICE D.RAMESH 10.12.2025 RD 4 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE D.RAMESH WRIT PETITION NO.31645 OF 2025 10.12.2025 RD