Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50319 (PNJ)

HUTASHNI SHARMA AND OTHERS v. ER PAWAN KUMAR

FAO/2559/2025 · 2025-07-11

Anil Kshetarpal, To Be Nominated

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

110 IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH Date of Decision: 11.07.2025 FAO-2559-2025 (O&M) HUTASHNI SHARMA AND ORS ... APPELLANTS VS. PAWAN KUMAR .. RESPONDENT FAO-3300-2025 (O&M) PAWAN KUMAR ... APPELLANT VS. HUTASHNI SHARMA AND ORS .. RESPONDENTS CORAM: HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KSHETARPAL HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE ROHIT KAPOOR Present: Ms. Manmohan Kaur Dhaliwal, Advocate, for the appellant in FAO-2559-2025. Mr. Deepak Aggarwal, Advocate, for the appellant in FAO-3300-2025. **** ANIL KSHETARPAL , J. (ORAL) 1. These two cross appeals are being disposed of with the consent of learned counsel representing the parties particularly when proceedings are pending before the Family Court and only an interlocutory order passed by the Family Court is subject matter of challenge before the parties in these two appeals. 2. It is agreed that the Family Court will pass fresh order after considering all aspects of the matter including various objections put forth by Pawan Kumar. 3. The grievance of the Hutashni Sharma and two daughters for determining the amount of interim maintenance shall also be examined by the Court. SMRITI 2025.07.15 13:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment FAO-2559-2025 (O&M) & FAO-3300-2025 (O&M) -2- 4. With these observations, the appeals are disposed of. 5. Needless to observe the the Court will pass the order uninfluenced by the impugned order. (ANIL KSHETARPAL) JUDGE 11.07.2025 (ROHIT KAPOOR) smriti JUDGE Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No SMRITI 2025.07.15 13:01 I attest to the accuracy and authenticity of this order/judgment