Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50319 (ALL)

SMT PUSHPA DEVI v. STATE OF U.P. AND 3 OTHERS

WRIC/13673/2025 · 2025-05-01

Shekhar B Saraf, Y K Srivastava

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:69831-DB Court No. - 40 Case :- WRIT - C No. - 13673 of 2025 Petitioner :- Smt Pushpa Devi Respondent :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Manoj Kumar Gautam Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C.,Pranjal Mehrotra Hon'ble Shekhar B. Saraf,J. Hon'ble Dr. Yogendra Kumar Srivastava,J. 1. Heard learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner and the learned Standing Counsel appearing on behalf of the State- respondents. 2. This is a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India wherein the petitioner is aggrieved by the inaction on part of the respondent authority in deciding the representation dated 19.04.2025, filed by the petitioner. 3. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of the petitioner submits that raising his grievances the petitioner has filed the aforesaid representation before the respondent authority, however the same has not yet been decided. 4. Upon due consideration, we are of the view that the respondent no.2 should be directed to pass a reasoned order upon the representation of the petitioner. 5. Accordingly, the respondent no.2/District Magistrate, Bijnor, is directed to pass a reasoned order upon the aforesaid representation of the petitioner in accordance with law, within a period of twelve weeks from date, after granting opportunity of hearing to the petitioner. 6. With the above direction, the writ petition is disposed of. Order Date :- 2.5.2025 Shahroz (Dr. Y.K. Srivastava,J.) (Shekhar B. Saraf,J.) Digitally signed by :- SHAHROJ ALAM High Court of Judicature at Allahabad