Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Punjab and Haryana · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50318 (PNJ)

DARSHAN LAL v. STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS

CWP/11054/2023 · 2025-05-13

Vinod S Bhardwaj

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF PUNJAB AND HARYANA AT CHANDIGARH 251 CWP-11054-2023 Date of decision: 13.05.2025 DARSHAN LAL ......Petitioner VERSUS STATE OF HARYANA AND OTHERS .......Respondents CORAM : HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VINOD S. BHARDWAJ ***** Present: - None for the petitioner. Mr. Rahul Dev, Addl. A.G. Haryana. ***** VINOD S. BHARDWAJ, J. (Oral) Prayer in the instant writ petition is for directing the respondents to comply with the judgment dated 05.07.2013 passed in CWP- 23790 of 2011 and to revise the pension of the petitioner as per the judgment dated 26.09.2000 in CWP-18974-1998 titled as “Abdul Kayyum and another versus State of Haryana and others”. A further prayer has been made for re-fixation of the pension of the petitioner at par with Abdul Kayyum (supra). Learned State Counsel on instructions from Mr. Raghubir Singh, Assistant submits that the necessary relief has already been granted and the pension of the petitioner stands released. He is also not in a position to dispute that the State instructions would prohibit the respondents from VISHAL SHARMA 2025.05.15 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document CWP-11054-2023 -2- effecting recovery for the benefits that have already been given. There is no concealment, fraud or mis-representation on the part of the petitioner. In view of the above, the present writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous at this stage with liberty to the petitioner to seek revival of the present writ petition in case the aforesaid statements are found to be factually incorrect. (VINOD S. BHARDWAJ) MAY 13, 2025 JUDGE Vishal Sharma Whether speaking/reasoned : Yes/No Whether Reportable : Yes/No VISHAL SHARMA 2025.05.15 10:21 I attest to the accuracy and integrity of this document