1 2025:CGHC:47344 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9234 of 2023 Dr. Shobhna Upadhyay W/o Shri J.K. Upadhyay, Aged About 65 Years R/o D-3 Forest Officers Colony, Raja Talab, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Petitioner versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through The Secretary, Higher Education Department, Mantralaya, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2 - The Commissioner, Directorate of Higher Education, Block-3, Second And Third Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar, Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 3 - The Additional Director, Directorate of Higher Education, Block-3, Second And Third Floor, Indravati Bhawan, Atal Nagar Nawa Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 4 - The Principal, Government Nagarjun Postgraduate Science College, Raipur, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents (Cause-title taken from Case Information System) For Petitioner : Mr. Prateek Sharma, Advocate For Respondents-State : Mr. Ankur Kashyap, Dy. G.A. Hon’ble Shri Amitendra Kishore Prasad, Judge Order on Board 15.09.2025 1. By way of this writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for following relief(s):- YOGESH TIWARI Digitally signed by YOGESH TIWARI Date: 2025.09.15 18:53:55 +0530 2 “10.1 That, this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to call the entire records pertaining to the case of petitioner from the respondents. 10.2 That this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue an appropriate writ, thereby setting-aside/quashing the impugned order dated 28.02.2023 (Annexure P/1). 10.3 That any other relief/order which may deem fit and just in the facts and circumstances of the case, including cost of the petition may kindly be awarded to the petitioner.” 2. Learned State counsel submits that the impugned order has already been set aside, and therefore, the present writ petition does not survive for adjudication and has become infructuous. 3. In view of the submission made on behalf of the State and the fact that the impugned order dated 28.02.2023 (Annexure P/1) already stands set aside, nothing further survives for consideration in the present writ petition. 4. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of as having been rendered infructuous. Sd/- (Amitendra Kishore Prasad) Judge Yogesh