Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50316 (CHH)

ROSHAN LAL PAIKRA v. SMT. POONAM @ PURVI PAIKRA

CRR/1342/2023 · 2025-08-10

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 2025:CGHC:40128 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR CRR No. 1342 of 2023 Roshan Lal Paikra S/o Late Bharat Lal Paikra Aged About 32 Years R/o Village Madhi, Chowki- Silyari (Nirmalkarpara), P.S.- Dharsiva, Tahsil And District- Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicant versus 1. Smt. Poonam @ Purvi Paikra W/o Roshan Lal Paikra Aged About 28 Years D/o Shri Pawan Verma, R/o New Kailashpuri, Raipur, P.S.- Tikrapara, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, At Present R/o Teachers Colony, Tilda, P.S.- Nevra, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh 2. Minor Gagandeep Paikra Aged About 06 Month, Through Next Friend Mother Smt. Poonam @ Purvi Paikra, Aged About 28 Years, W/o Roshan Lal Paikra, R/o New Kailashpuri, Raipur, P.S.- Tikrapara, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh, At Present R/o Teachers Colony, Tilda, P.S.- Nevra, District : Raipur, Chhattisgarh ... Respondents For Applicant : Mr. Navin Shukla, Advocate. For Respondents : Mr. Krishna Kumar Dewangan, Advocate. H on'ble Shri Ramesh Sinha, Chief Justice Order on Board PREETI KUMARI Digitally signed by PREETI KUMARI Date: 2025.08.13 14:07:48 +0530 2 11.08.2025 1. Heard Mr. Navin Shukla, learned counsel appearing for the applicant. Also heard Mr. Krishna Kumar Dewangan, learned counsel for the respondents. 2. The present revision has been filed with a following prayers:- “It is therefore prayed that this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to allow this revision and set aside the impugned order dated 10.11.2023 passed by the learned Principal Judge, Family Court, Raipur, District- Raipur (C.G.) in Criminal M.C.C. No. 675/2016 in the case titled "Smt. Poonam @ Purvi Paikra & another Vs. Roshan Lal Paikra" (Annexure P/1), in the interest of justice.” 3. Learned counsel for the revisionist/applicant submits that the matter has been compromised between the parties. 4. In view of the submission made by the learned counsel for the applicant, the present revision is disposed of. 5. Let a certified copy of this order as well as original record of this case be sent to the trial Court concerned for necessary information and compliance forthwith. Sd/- (Ramesh Sinha) Chief Justice Preeti