Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Chhattisgarh · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50313 (CHH)

SMT. ASHWANI BAI v. CHUNESHWAR LAL SAHU

MCC/775/2025 · 2025-08-10

Shri Radhakishan Agrawal

body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

1 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR MCC No. 775 of 2025 1 - Smt. Ashwani Bai W/o Late Arjun Sahu Aged About 24 Years 2 - Ku. Divya Sahu D/o Late Arjun Sahu Aged About 7 Years 3 - Dani Sahu S/o Late Arjun Sahu Aged About 5 Years Minor, 4 - Ku. Tamin Sahu D/o Late Arjun Sahu Aged About 3 Years Appellants No. 2 to 4 are Minors, Through Natural Guardian A-1, Smt. Ashwani Bai, R/o Village- Binouri, Post- Fingeshwar, Police Station - Rajim, District - Raipur (C.G.) 5 - Tijya Bai W/o Ram Asara Sahu Aged About 58 Years Resident Of Village Binouri, Post Fingeshwar, Police Station Rajim, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. ... Applicants/Appellants versus 1 - Chuneshwar Lal Sahu S/o Mannu Lal Sahu Aged About 28 Years Resident Of Village Devagaon, Police Station Fingeshwar, District Raipur, Chhattisgarh. 2 - (a) Smt. Manu Bai W/o Late Bhuvan Lal Sahu 2 - (b) Shekhar Sahu S/o Bhuvan Lal Sahu Aged About 23 Years 2 - (c) Laxman Sahu S/o Late Bhuvan Lal Sahu Aged About 20 Years 2 - (d) Nutesh Sahu S/o Late Bhuvan Lal Sahu Aged About 18 Years No. 2 (a) to 2 (d) are R/o Village- Soth Parsada, Police Station- Nayapara, District- Raipur (C.G.) 3 - Ifco Tokio General Insurance Company Limited 3rd Floor 345-347, Lal Ganga Shopping Mal, G.E. Road, Ring Road Raipur, (C.G.) 4 - Reliance General Insurance Company Limited Through The Divisional Manager, Divisional Office, Ravi Bhawan, 2nd Floor, Shop No. 412-413, Raipur (C.G.) ... Non-applicants/Respondent(s) For Applicants. : Shri Raghavendra Pradhan, Advocate. For Respondents : -- (HON’BLE SHRI JUSTICE RADHAKISHAN AGRAWAL) Digitally signed by ANJANI KUMAR ALLENA Date: 2025.08.11 16:59:33 +0530 2 Order on Board 11/08/2025 1. Heard on M.C.C. for restoration of MAC No. 219/2016 dismissed vide order dated 11.06.2025 for want of prosecution. 2. On due consideration and for the reasons stated in the application, which is supported by an affidavit, I am inclined to allow the same. 3. Accordingly, M.C.C. is allowed and the MAC No.219/2016 is restored to its original number. A copy of this order be kept on the record of MAC No. 219/2016 Sd/- (Radhakishan Agrawal) JUDGE Anjani