Research › Search › Judgment

Allahabad High Court · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50311 (ALL)

MEHILAL v. RAM SIROMANI AND 12 OTHERS

A227/4433/2025 · 2025-05-01

Rohit Ranjan Agarwal

Original Suitbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:69701 Court No. - 9 Case :- MATTERS UNDER ARTICLE 227 No. - 4433 of 2025 Petitioner :- Mehilal Respondent :- Ram Siromani And 12 Others Counsel for Petitioner :- Arvind Kumar Maurya Counsel for Respondent :- C.S.C. Hon'ble Rohit Ranjan Agarwal,J. 1. This is plaintiff's petition. 2. In the suit instituted by plaintiff-petitioner, an application for grant of temporary injunction was filed which was allowed by trial court. According to petitioner, the defendants had violated the interim injunction order which led to filing of application under Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC, which is pending consideration. The sole prayer made in the writ petition is for expeditious disposal of the application Order XXXIX Rule 2A CPC, registered as Contempt Application No. 49 of 2023. 3. As no useful purpose would be served in keeping the matter pending, the writ petition is being disposed of, at the admission stage, without calling for counter affidavit or issuing notice to private respondents, with a direction upon court concerned to decide the aforesaid Contempt Application No. 49 of 2023 pending in Original Suit No. 1240 of 2013, in accordance with law, after hearing all affected parties, preferably within a period of four months from the date of production of certified copy of this order. 4. With the aforesaid directions, writ petition stands disposed of. 5. It is made clear that this Court has not adjudicated the matter on merits. Order Date :- 2.5.2025 V.S.Singh Digitally signed by :- VIDYA SAGAR SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad