- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7661 CRL.P No. 101589 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 13TH DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CRIMINAL PETITION NO. 101589 OF 2025 (482(CR.PC)/528(BNSS)) BETWEEN: 1. SUNITA D/O RAMAPPA NAGNUR OCC. HOUSEHOLD, AGE. 34 YEARS, R/O. AINAPUR, TQ. KAGAWAD, DIST. BELAGAVI-591303 2. RAMAPPA S/O. BHIMA NAGANUR OCC. AGRICULTURE, AGE. 76 R/O. AINAPUR, TQ. KAGAWAD, DIST. BELAGAVI-591303 3. VITTAL RAMAPPA NAGANUR OCC. AGRICULTURE, AGE. 30 YEARS, R/O. AINAPUR, TQ. KAGAWAD, DIST. BELAGAVI-591303 4. MUREAPPA RAMAPPA NAGANUR OCC. AGRICULTURE, AGE. 32 YEARS R/O. AINAPUR, TQ. KAGAWAD, DIST. BELAGAVI-591303 5. JAYASHREE RAMAPPA NAGANUR OCC. HOUSEHOLD, AGE. 66 YEARS, R/O. AINAPUR, TQ. KAGAWAD, DIST. BELAGAVI-591303 …PETITIONERS (BY SRI. CHETAN NAIK, ADVOCATE) Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7661 CRL.P No. 101589 of 2025 AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA BY KAGWAD POLICE STATION, KAGWAD R/BY ITS STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA DHARWAD-580011 2. SUNIL APPASAB DANOLLI OCC. AGRICULTURE, AGE. 31 YEARS, R/O. AINAPUR, TQ. KAGAWAD, DIST. BELAGAVI-591303 …RESPONDENTS (BY SMT. KIRTILATA R. PATIL, HCGP FOR R1) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S 482 OF CR.P.C. (U/S. 528 OF BNSS, 2023) SEEKING TO QUASHING THE COMPLAINT DATED 27.12.2024 AND ENTIRE PROCEEDINGS THEREON IN CRIME NO.231/2024 FILED BY 2ND RESPONDENT AGAINST PETITIONER/ACCUSED NOS.1 TO 5 BEFORE KAGWAD PS, KAGWAD, PENDING ON THE FILE OF CIVIL JUDGE AND JMFC COURT, KAGWAD AND ETC. THIS PETITION, COMING ON FOR ADMISSION, THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7661 CRL.P No. 101589 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T) Sri. Chetan Naik, learned counsel for the petitioners, has filed a memo seeking withdrawal of the petition, stating that the present petition was filed under Section 482 of Cr.P.C. seeking quashing of the FIR. In the meantime, the Investigating Officer has completed the investigation and filed the charge sheet against the petitioners. Hence, the petition has become infrucutous. Accordingly, the learned counsel prays that the petition be dismissed as not pressed. In view of the memo and supporting submission, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty is granted as prayed for. Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE RSH / CT - AN LIST NO.: 1 SL NO.: 33