IN THE HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT PATNA CRIMINAL MISCELLANEOUS No.44392 of 2025 Arising Out of PS. Case No.-8 Year-2025 Thana- NAGAR District- Vaishali ====================================================== 1. Chandan Kumar @ Karan @ Karan Kumar Sinha @ Chandan S/o Late Kishor Sinha All R/o- Village- Shahpur, Patori, P.S- Patori, Distt.- Samastipur A/p -Sharda Sadan, Subhash Chowk, PS- Nagar(Town) Hajipur, Distt- Vaishali. 2. Rahul Kumar @ Vishal Kumar S/o Late Kishor Sinha All R/o- Village- Shahpur, Patori, P.S- Patori, Distt.- Samastipur A/p -Sharda Sadan, Subhash Chowk, PS- Nagar(Town) Hajipur, Distt- Vaishali. 3. Prince Kumar S/o Late Kishor Sinha All R/o- Village- Shahpur, Patori, P.S- Patori, Distt.- Samastipur A/p -Sharda Sadan, Subhash Chowk, PS- Nagar(Town) Hajipur, Distt- Vaishali. 4. Guriya Devi @ Nitu Devi W/o Late Kishor Sinha All R/o- Village- Shahpur, Patori, P.S- Patori, Distt.- Samastipur A/p -Sharda Sadan, Subhash Chowk, PS- Nagar(Town) Hajipur, Distt- Vaishali. ... ... Petitioner/s Versus The State of Bihar ... ... Opposite Party/s ====================================================== Appearance : For the Petitioner/s : Ms. Jyoti Kumari, Advocate Mr. Ranjan Kumar Sinha, Advocate Mr. Mukum Sinha , Advocate For the Opposite Party/s : Mr. Anant Kumar 1 ====================================================== CORAM: HONOURABLE MR. JUSTICE SANDEEP KUMAR ORAL ORDER 6 25-02-2026 Heard the learned counsel for the petitioners and learned counsel for the State. 2. The petitioners apprehend arrest in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 08 of 2025 registered for offences under Sections 87 and 3(5) of the Bharatiya Nyaya Sanhita, 2023. 3. As per the prosecution case, the petitioners are Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44392 of 2025(6) dt.25-02-2026 2/3 accused of kidnapping the wife of the informant. 4. Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the petitioners are quite innocent and have not committed any offence. He further submits that there is no direct and specific allegation against the petitioners; rather, there is a general and omnibus allegation against all the petitioners. He also submits that there is a matrimonial dispute between the informant and his wife. 5. Learned APP for the State has vehemently opposed the prayer for bail. 6. I have considered the submissions of the parties and have gone through the materials available on record. From the statement of the victim, it appears that she had left her matrimonial house on her own due to the torture meted out by her husband. 7. In view of the above, this application for anticipatory bail is allowed. 8. Accordingly, let the petitioners, above-named, in the event of their arrest or surrender within four weeks from today in the Court below, be released on bail on furnishing bail bonds of Rs.10,000/- (Rupees ten thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of the learned Patna High Court CR. MISC. No.44392 of 2025(6) dt.25-02-2026 3/3 Court below where the case is pending/successor court in connection with Hajipur Town P.S. Case No. 08 of 2025 subject to the conditions as laid down under Section 482(2) of the BNSS. Shishir/- (Sandeep Kumar, J) U T