Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Orissa · body

2025 DAILYLAW 503 (ORI)

GUNIA MALLICK v. ODISHA INDUSTRIAL INFRASTRUCTURE DEVELOPMENT CORPORATION, BBSR

WP(C)/27656/2025 · 2026-02-24

Biraja Prasanna Satapathy

Writ Petition (Civil)body2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

IN THE HIGH COURT OF ORISSA AT CUTTACK W.P.(C) No.27656 of 2025 Gunia Mallick …. Petitioner Mr. A.M. Das, Adv. -versus- Odisha Industrial Infrastructure Development Corporation and Others …. Opposite Parties Mr. L.K. Maharana, Advocate for TPCODL CORAM: JUSTICE BIRAJA PRASANNA SATAPATHY Order No. ORDER 24.02.2026 01. 1. This matter is taken up through Hybrid Arrangement (Virtual/Physical) Mode. 2. Heard learned counsel appearing for the parties. 3. The present Writ Petition has been filed inter alia with the following prayer:- “In this circumstances, it is humbly prayed before this Hon'ble Court may kindly be pleased to issue notice to the Opp. parties as to why this case shall not be allowed and Opp. party Nos.3 & 4 shall not be directed to restoration of Electricity connection to the petitioner Qr. No.MIGA/72, Mancheswar Industrial Estate, Bhubaneswar, for the interest of justice;” 4. Learned counsel appearing on behalf of TPCODL contended that Petitioner is continuing in unauthorized occupation of the quarter so allotted in his favour by the authorities of IDCO even after his dismissal from services w.e.f 07.11.2015. 4.1. It is contended that basing on a letter issued by IDCO, power supply to the premises in question has been disconnected, IDCO being the owner of the quarter in question. 5. Mr. A.M. Das, learned counsel appearing for the Petitioner on the other hand contended that in terms of the letter of allotment issued in his favour under Annexure-4, since Petitioner has taken power connection by paying the required fees, power supply cannot be disconnected without prior notice. 6. Having heard learned counsel appearing for the parties and considering the submission made and the instruction provided to the Court, this Court is of the view that in absence of no objection from IDCO, power supply to the premises in question cannot be restored. if the Petitioner so likes, he can move to the authorities of IDCO, to get the NOC and after obtaining the same, he can make a prayer before the authorities of TPCODL to restore power supply. 7. With the aforesaid liberty, the Writ Petition stands disposed of. (Biraja Prasanna Satapathy) Judge Basudev