GADIGATTLA VIJAYALAKSHMI v. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
WP/26122/2025 · 2025-09-23
Tarlada Rajasekhar Rao
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50298 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50298 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010495462025
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3330] WEDNESDAY, THE TWENTY FOURTH DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO WRIT PETITION NO: 26122/2025 Between:
1. GADIGATTLA VIJAYALAKSHMI, W/O.LATE SURYANARAYANA, AGED 66 YEARS, R/O.D.NO. 14-4-6/1, CHALLA VAARI VEEDHI, PEDDAPURAM TOWN AND MANDAL, EAST GODAVARI DISTRICT. ...PETITIONER AND
1. THE STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, REP.BY ITS PRINCIPAL SECRETARY, REVENUE DEPARTMENT, SECRETARIAT, VELAGAPUDI, AMARAVATHI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. T
2. THE DISTRICT COLLECTOR, KAKINADA DISTRICT AT KAKINADA. 3. THE REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICER, PEDDAPURAM REVENUE DIVISION, PEDDAPURAM, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 4. THE TAHSILDAR, PEDDAPURAM MANDAL, PEDDAPURAM, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 5. THE DISTRICT SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS OFFICER, SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS DEPARTMENT, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 6. THE ASSISTANT DIRECTOR, SURVEY AND LAND RECORDS, KAKINADA, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 7. THE DEPUTY INSPECTOR OF SURVEY, REVENUE DIVISIONAL OFFICE, PEDDAPURAM, KAKINADA DISTRICT. 8. THE MANDAL DEPUTY SURVEYOR, PEDDAPURAM MANDAL, KAKINADA DISTRICT. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed therewith, the High Court may be pleased topleased to issue a Writ of Mandamus, or other appropriate writ, order or direction, declaring the action of the Respondent Nos.2 to 8 herein in not considering the Mee-Seva Online Application NO.FSNV012400371998 dated 31-01-2024 for conducting the survey for demarcation of land belongs to the petitioner in Sy.No.62/13B admeasuring Ac.0.18 cents situated at Peddapuram Village, Peddapuram Mandal, Kakinada District out of total extent of land admeasuring Ac. 15.92 cents in Sy.No.62/13 is illegal, arbitrary,
2 unreasonable and violative of Articles 14, 21 and 300-A of Constitution of India and contrary to the provisions of Andhra Pradesh Survey and Boundaries Act, 1923 and consequently direct the Respondents 2 to 8 herein to consider and dispose of the Mee- Seva Online Application No.FSNV012400371998 dated 31-01-2024 in accordance with law and pass IA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 151 CPC praying that in the circumstances stated in the affidavit filed in support of the petition, the High Court may be pleased Pleased to direct Respondents 2 to 8 herein forthwith to consider the Mee-Seva Online Application No.FSNV012400371998 dated 31- 01-2024 for conducting the survey and fix the boundaries to the petitioner’s land to an extent of Ac.0.18 cents in Sy.No.62/13B out of total extent of land admeasuring Ac.
15.92 cents in Sy.No.62/13 situated at Peddapuram Village, Peddapuram Mandal, Kakinada District, pending disposal of the writ petition and pass Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. AKULA SRI KRISHNA SAI BHARGAV Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR REVENUE
3 THE HONOURABLE SRI JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO
WRIT PETITION No.26122 of 2025
ORDER:-
Shorn of all unnecessary facts asserted in the affidavit filed in support of the writ petition, the specific case of the petitioner is that she is the absolute owner and possessor of the land. She has submitted F-Line application bearing No.FSNV012400371998 dated 31.01.2024 through online, for conducting survey and fixation of boundaries of her land to an extent of Ac.0.18 cents in Sy.No.62/13B out of total extent of land admeasuring Ac.15.92 cents in Sy.No.62/13 situated at Peddapuram Village, Peddapuram Mandal, Kakinada District. However, the respondent-authorities went on postponing the survey. Despite the petitioner’s persistent requests, the inaction of the respondent authorities in processing the petitioner’s F-Line application has constrained her to approach this Court. 2. Learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue appearing for respondents has submitted that appropriate action will be taken on the F-Line application submitted by the petitioner, in accordance with law. 3. Considering the submissions of both the learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Assistant Government Pleader for Revenue, without going into the merits of case, the Writ Petition is disposed of
4 directing concerned authorities to consider the F-Line application bearing No. FSNV012400371998 dated 31.01.2024, submitted by the petitioner for conducting survey, sub-division and fixing of boundaries of the petitioner’s land, by issuing notice to all concerned/interested persons, and to pass appropriate orders, in accordance with law, within a period of six (06) weeks from the date of receipt of a copy of this order. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions pending, if any, shall stand closed. ___________________________________ JUSTICE TARLADA RAJASEKHAR RAO Date: 24.09.2025 KBN