1 2025:CGHC:40062 NAFR HIGH COURT OF CHHATTISGARH AT BILASPUR WPS No. 9371 of 2025 1 - Rinku Dewangan S/o Late Nandkishor Dewangan Aged About 52 Years Working As Superintendent At Office Of Collector, Sukma District- Sukma (C.G.) ... Petitioner(s) versus 1 - State of Chhattisgarh Through - The Secretary, Revenue And Calamity Management, Department, Mahanadi Bhawan, Atal Nagar, New Raipur (C.G.) 2 - The Collector Sukma, District- Sukma (C.G.). ... Respondent(s) For Petitioner (s) : Shri Somkant Verma, Advocate. For State : Shri Sabyasachi Choubey, Panel Lawyer. Hon’ble Shri Justice Ravindra Kumar Agrawal, J Order on Board 11.08. 202 5 1. The petitioner has filed this petition alleging that though the transfer order has been issued on 30.06.2025, however till date the petitioner has not been relieved. 2. The issue regarding implementation of transfer order has been considered by this Court in the case of Ms. Manisha Agrawal Vs. State of Chhattisgarh and others, 2015(4) C.G.L.J.182, wherein relying upon several judgments of the Supreme Court it has been held by this Court that once the employee has been transferred it is required to be complied with unless it is modified, varied or cancelled. Therefore, in these circumstances, either the transfer order has to be 2 implemented or the State has the option to cancel, vary or modify or keep in abeyance. 3. Accordingly, the writ petition is disposed of with the direction that if the transfer order of the petitioner is still operative, the respondent authorities shall relieve the petitioner towards implementation of the transfer order. 4. It is also made clear that if any administrative exigency impede the petitioners' relieving, the petitioner shall be informed in writing. It will also remain open for the respondents to reconsider the issue of transfer on account of any administrative exigency. Sd/- (Ravindra Kumar Agrawal) Judge inder