APHC010557712025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI .•M FRIDAY, THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE sp \ € PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10948 OF 2025 Between: Pallipati Bonus Reddy, S/o Late Pallipati Sidda Reddy, Aged about 31 years. Advocate, R/o D.No. 15-30-3, Padmavati Nagar, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner AND The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court at Amaravathi. ...Respondent Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to set aside the order dated 25-08-2025 passed NBW against the petitioner in S.C. No. 72 of 2019, on the file of the court of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor. lA NO: 1 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to dispense with certified copy of NBW against the petitioner in S.C. No. 72 of 2019, dt 25/08/2025 on the file of the court of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor. iA NO: 2 OF 2025 Petition under Section 482 of Cr.P.C and 528 of BNSS praying that in the circumstances stated in the Memorandum of Grounds of Criminal Petition, the High Court may be pleased to- stay of further proceedings against the Petitioner in S.C.No. 72 of 2019 on the file of the Court of the Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor. Counsel for the Petitioner: Sri Amancharla Satish Babu Counsel for the Respondent: Public Prosecutor The Court made the following order: J APHC010557712025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI FRIDAY,THE SEVENTEENTH DAY OF OCTOBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION NO: 10948 OF 2025 Between: 1. Pallipati Bonus Reddy. S/o .Late Pallipati Sidda Reddy, Aged about 31 years. Advocate, R/o D.No.15-30-3, Padmavati Nagar, Tirupati Urban Mandal, Chittoor District, Andhra Pradesh. ...Petitioner I AND 1. The State of Andhra Pradesh, Rep. by its Public Prosecutor, High Court Amaravathi. at ...Respondent Counsel for the Petitioner: AMANCHARLA SATISH BABU Counsel for the Respondent The Court made the following order: I. •4' 1 / THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA CRIMINAL PETITION (SRI NO: 13553 OF 2025 / ORDER: This Criminal Petition has been filed seeking to set aside the order dated 25.08.2025 passed NBW against the petitioner in S.C.N0.72 of 2019, on the file of the Court of the Hon’ble Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor. 02. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and the learned Assistant Public Prosecutor on behalf of the State. 03. The office objection is unsustainable. The office is directed to number the petition. 04. Learned counsel for the petitioner would submit that the petitioner herein is the de-facto complainant in S.C.No.72 of 2019 on the file of the learned Principal District and Sessions Judge, Chittoor. The petitioner could not attend the Court as a witness due to medical reasons. Consequently, the learned Trial Judge issued a Non-Bailable Warrant (NBW) against the petitioner. It is submitted that the petitioner was hospitalized due to a cardiac issue and hence could not appear before the Court. Learned counsel would further submit that when the witness was unable to attend on medical grounds, the learned Trial Judge ought to have recalled the witness instead of issuing the NBW. 7 / 05. Learned Assistant Public Prosecutor submits that the evidence of the de-facto complainant is essential for proper adjudication of the case and the Court may pass appropriate orders. Considering the submissions made by both sides, the petition is disposed of with a direction to the learned Trial Judge to entertain the application filed by the petitioner, fix a specific date for the examination of the de-facto complainant, and proceed with the trial as expeditiously as possible. No further adjournment shall be granted on mere asking. 06. Accordingly, the Criminal Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. Sd/. K SRINIVASA RAJU ASSISTANT REGISTRAR //TRUE COPY// A SECTION OFFICER To, 1. The Principal District and Sessions 2. One CC to Sri Amancharla Satish 3. Two CCS to The Public Prosecutor, Amaravati [OUT] 4. Two CD Copies Judge, Chittoor, Chittoor District. Babu Advocate [OPUC] High Court of Andhra Pradesh at SAM vna HIGH COURT \ DATED:17/10/2025 ORDER CRLP No. 10948 of 2025 I( 2 3 OCT 2025 )| ★SIS'reiil DISPOSING OF THE CRLP