Research › Search › Judgment

High Court of Karnataka · body

2025 DAILYLAW 50285 (KAR)

SRI RAHUL B v. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA

CRL.P/101965/2025 · 2025-06-23

Venkatesh Naik T

Transfer Petitionbody2025

Judgment text

Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.

- 1 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7965 CRL.P No. 101965 of 2025 IN THE HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD BENCH DATED THIS THE 23RD DAY OF JUNE, 2025 BEFORE THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T CRIMINAL PETITION NO.101965 OF 2025 (482 OF Cr.PC/528 OF BNSS) BETWEEN: 1. SRI. RAHUL B. AGE: 27 YEARS, OCC: COMPUTER OPERATOR AT DC OFFICE HOSAPETE, R/O. HM THANDA, HADAGALI TQ, VIJAYANAGAR DISTRICT, PIN-583101. 2. SMT. PUSTPABAI, AGE: 52 YEARS, OCC: TP OFFICE HADAGALI TOWN, R/O. KUMANALLI THANDA, HADAGALI TQ, VIJAYANAGAR DISTRICT, PIN-583101. …PETITIONERS (BY SHRI PRAVEENKUMAR G., ADV. FOR SHRI ANAND R. KOLLI, ADVOCATE) AND: 1. THE STATE OF KARNATAKA, REP. BY STATE PUBLIC PROSECUTOR, Digitally signed by RAKESH S HARIHAR Location: High Court of Karnataka, Dharwad Bench - 2 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7965 CRL.P No. 101965 of 2025 HIGH COURT OF KARNATAKA, DHARWAD, THROUGH HADAGALI POLICE STATION, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR, PIN-583101. 2. KUM. VEENA BALARAJANAIK, AGE: 20 YEARS, OCC: COOLIE, R/O. KUMARANALLI THANDA, TQ. HADAGALI, DIST. VIJAYANAGAR, PIN-583101. …RESPONDENTS (BY SHRI ABHISHEK MALIPATIL, HCGP FOR R1; SHRI AVINASH BANAKAR, ADV. FOR R2) THIS CRIMINAL PETITION IS FILED U/S.482 OF CR.P.C. (528 OF BNSS), PRAYING TO QUASH IMPUGNED REGISTRATION OF FIR IN CRIME NO.59/2025 FOR THE ALLEGED OFFENCES PUNISHABLE U/S.376(2)(N), 354(A), 504, 506, 323, 114, 313, 420 OF IPC, DOWRY PROHIBITION ACT, 1961 U/S.4 OF SC/ST PREVENTION OF ATROCITIES ACT 1989 U/S.3(1)R) 3(1)(S), 3(2)(V) REGISTERED BY THE HADAGALI POLICE STATION PENDING ON THE FILE OF HON’BLE PRINCIPLE DISTRICT AND SESSION COURT BELLARI (F.T.S.C.- I), IN THE INTEREST OF JUSTICE. THIS PETITION IS COMING ON FOR ADMISSION THIS DAY, ORDER WAS MADE THEREIN AS UNDER: - 3 - HC-KAR NC: 2025:KHC-D:7965 CRL.P No. 101965 of 2025 ORAL ORDER (PER: THE HON'BLE MR. JUSTICE VENKATESH NAIK T) Learned counsel for the petitioners filed a memo for withdrawal. The contents of memo read as under: “The counsel for petitioner submits as under; In the above top noted petition and state has been filed charge sheet. Hence petitioner seeks leave of this Hon’ble Court withdraw the petition with liberty to file fresh petition in the interest of justice and equity.” In view of the memo and supporting submission, the petition is dismissed as withdrawn. However, liberty as sought for is granted to the petitioners. Sd/- (VENKATESH NAIK T) JUDGE AM /CT-AN List No.: 1 Sl No.: 51