VENKATARAMANA CABLE NETWORK v. State of Andhra Pradesh
WP/8926/2021 · 2025-09-22
Venkata Jyothirmai Pratapa
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50275 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50275 (AP) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
APHC010161032021
IN THE HIGH COURT OF ANDHRA PRADESH AT AMARAVATI (Special Original Jurisdiction) [3396] TUESDAY, THE TWENTY THIRD DAY OF SEPTEMBER TWO THOUSAND AND TWENTY FIVE PRESENT THE HONOURABLE DR JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA WRIT PETITION NO: 8926/2021 Between:
1. VENKATARAMANA CABLE NETWORK, REPRESENTED BY ITS MANAGER, MARUPUDI NAGA PRAVEEN S/O. MARUPUDI NAGESWAR RAO, AGED 34 YEARS, R/O. 19-6-1, SHIVALAYAM STREET, OLD PONNURU M AND POST GUNTUR DISTRICT, ANDHRA PRADESH - 522124
...PETITIONER AND
1. STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH, , REP BY ITS SECRETARY, DEPARTMENT
OF HOME AFFAIRS, A.P. SECRETARIAT, VELGAPUDI, GUNTUR DISTRICT. 2. THE SUPERINTENDENT OF POLICE, , GUNTUR RURAL DISTRICT, GUNTUR STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
3. THE SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, , GUNTUR URBAN DISTRICT, GUNTUR, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH
4. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, , BAPATLA, GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 5. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, , GUNTUR SOUTH, GUNTUR, STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH. 6. DEPUTY SUPERINTENDANT OF POLICE, , TENALI, GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRAPRADESH. 7. CIRCLE INSPECTOR STATION HOUSE OFFICER, PONNUR URBAN TOWN POLICE STATION, PONNUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 8. CIRCLE INSPECTOR, PONNUR RURAL POLICE STATION, PONNUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 9. SUBINSPECTORSTATION HOUSE OFFICER, PONNUR RURAL POLICE STATION PONNUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT , STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 10. SUB INSPECTOR STATION HOUSE OFFICER, CHEBROLU,CHEBROLU MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT ' STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 11. SUB INSPECTOR STATION HOUSE OFFICER, TSUNDUR, TSUNDUR MANDAL GUNTUR DISTRICT, STATE OF ANDHRA PRADESH. 12. SUB INSPECTOR STATION HOUSE OFFICER, AMARTHALURR, AMARTHALURUMANDAL, GUNTUR DISTRICT,
STATE OF
2
ANDHRA PRADESH. 13. M/S SAI COMMUNICATIONS, REP BY ITS CABLE OPERATOR SHAIK SAIFULLA,S/O. LATE.SHAIK YASEEN, AGED 28 YEARS, OCC CABLE BUSINESS, YASIN PLAZA, ISLAND CENTRE, GBC ROAD, PONNUR, GUNTUR DISTRICT
STATE OF ANDHRPRADESH-522124. ...RESPONDENT(S): Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India praying that in the Counsel for the Petitioner:
1. A TULSI RAJ GOKUL Counsel for the Respondent(S):
1. GP FOR HOME
2. KARUMANCHI INDRANEEL BABU
The Court made the following: ORDER:
This Writ Petition is filed under Article 226 of Constitution of India with the following prayer for:
“....
to issue a writ of Mandamus or any other similar writ or direction to the Respondents 1 to 12., declaring their action of interfering with the repair works and the legitimate cable transmission works of the petitioner carried out in the town of Ponnur Chebrolu, Tsumudur, Baptla and Tenali Mandals to their cables laid on the poles of the APSPDCL, Andhra Pradesh Southern Power Distribution Company Ltd, by paying the pole rental charges to the said department and for not taking palpable action against the 13th respondent or any other person or persons acting on behalf of the 13th respondent cable operator on the complaints made by the petitioner and its affiliate cable operators or taking concrete steps to prevent the damage, destruction and disruption to the cable transmission services, fiber and cable equipment of the petitioner laid on the poles of APSPDCL, as illegal, arbitrary, unjust violative of Articles 14,21 and 19 (l) (g) of the Constitution of India and consequentially direct the respondents 1 to 11. as to not to interfere with the cable transmission activities of the petitioner and its affiliate LCOs which include but not limited to replacement of new cable with the damaged cable, repair, reconnection and reinstatement works on the poles of APSPDCL for ensuring smooth and uninterrupted cable and internet services to the customers
3
or subscribers connected to the petitioner's cable network during these covid outbreak situation.”
2. Today, when the matter is taken up for hearing, there is no representation on behalf of the petitioner. 3. Sri Md.Farooq, learned Assistant Government Pleader for Home, on instructions, would submit that they are not interfering in the business activities of the petitioner. 4. Recording the said submissions, the Writ Petition is disposed of. There shall be no order as to costs. As a sequel thereto, miscellaneous petitions, if any, pending shall stand closed. ________________________________________ Dr.JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA Date:23.09.2025 ASR
4
HON’BLE DR. JUSTICE VENKATA JYOTHIRMAI PRATAPA
W.P.No.8926 of 2021
Dt.23.09.2025
Asr