MUSTEHSEEN ALI BURNEY v. STATE OF U.P. AND 5 OTHERS
WRIC/13201/2025 · 2025-10-05
Saral Srivastava, Sudhanshu Chauhan
body2025
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50270 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
DailyLaw.ai
[ 2025 DAILYLAW 50270 (ALL) · dailylaw.ai ]
Judgment text
Extracted from the PDF above. The PDF is authoritative.
HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD WRIT - C No. - 13201 of 2025 Court No. - 40 HON'BLE SARAL SRIVASTAVA, J.
HON'BLE SUDHANSHU CHAUHAN, J.
1. Heard learned counsel for the petitioner and learned Standing Counsel for the State-functionaries. 2. By means of the present writ petition, the petitioner has prayed for the following:-
"(I). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus directing the District Program Officer, Bulandshahar (Respondent No.4) to submit recommendation for payment of ex-gratia amount alongwith report before the Additional District Magistrate (Administration)/Deputy District Election Officer (Panchayat and Municipal Body) Bulandshahar, District Bulandshahar (Respondent No.3) within time specify by this Hon'ble Court. (II). Issue a writ, order or direction in the nature of mandamus commanding the Finance and Account Officer State Election Commission, UP (respondent No.6) to sanction the amount of Rs.30 lakhs alongwith interest and Additional District Magistrate (Administration)/Deputy District Election Officer (Panchayat and Municipal Body) Bulandshahar, District Bulandshahar (respondent No.3) may be directed to make payment of the aforesaid amount to the petitioner within time specify by this Hon'ble Court. (III). Issue the cost of the petition in favour of the petitioner."
3. It is stated that the petitioner has submitted several representations to the respondent No.2-District Magistrate, Bulandshahar to consider his grievances but the respondent No.2 is not paying any heed to it. 4. Learned Standing Counsel submits that no useful purpose would be served Versus Counsel for Petitioner(s) : Bibhuti Narayan Singh Counsel for Respondent(s) : C.S.C., Tarun Agrawal Mustehseen Ali Burney .....Petitioner(s) State Of U.P. And 5 Others .....Respondent(s)
in keeping the writ petition pending and appropriate direction may be issued to the respondent No.2 to consider the grievance of the petitioner. 5. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case and without adverting into the merits of the case, the writ petition is disposed off permitting the petitioner to file a fresh representation alongwith certified copy of this order raising all his grievances before the respondent No.2-District Magistrate, Bulandshahar within a period of one month from today. In case, any such representation is filed by the petitioner, the respondent No.2 shall consider and decide the same in accordance with law within a period of two months thereafter from the date he receives the representation.
October 6, 2025 SS WRIC No. 13201 of 2025 2 (Sudhanshu Chauhan,J.) (Saral Srivastava,J.) Digitally signed by :- SUNIL KUMAR SHARMA High Court of Judicature at Allahabad