HIGH COURT OF JUDICATURE AT ALLAHABAD APPLICATION U/S 528 BNSS No. - 14752 of 2025 Court No. - 72 HON'BLE DEEPAK VERMA, J. 1. Supplementary affidavit, filed today, is taken on record. 2. Heard learned counsel for the applicants; learned counsel for the informant; learned A.G.A. for the State and perused the record. 3. The present 528 B.N.S.S. application has been filed to quash the Charge Sheet dated 18.08.2024; cognizance order dated 03.03.2025 as well as entire proceeding of Case No. 1930 of 2025 (State Vs. Gaurav Priya Sundaram and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 340 of 2024, Under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 1.P.C., Police Station- Naugawan Sadat, District- Amroha on the basis of compromise dated 07.03.2025 pending in the Court of Chief Judicial Magistrate, District- Amroha. 4. Learned counsel for the applicants submitted that both the parties lodged F.I.R. against each other and F.I.R. lodged by the applicants against the opposite party no. 2 as Case Crime No.355 of 2024, under Sections 506, 504, 323, 452 I.P.C. has been challenged before this Court which was allowed in terms of the compromise entered into between the parties vide order dated 04.09.2025. It is next submitted that now applicants and opposite party no.2 have amicably settled their dispute out of the Court. Applicant approached this Hon'ble Court by filing this 482 application with prayer to quash the proceedings on terms of compromise entered between the parties, the Hon'ble Court vide order dated 13.04.2025 sent the matter to trial court for verification of the parties and compromise application. Trial court vide Versus Counsel for Applicant(s) : Sunil Kumar Singh Counsel for Opposite Party(s) : Anil Kumar, Arvind Kumar Yadav, G.A. Gaurav Priya Sundaram And 4 Others .....Applicant(s) State of U.P. and Another .....Opposite Party(s) order dated 21.05.2025 verified the parties as well as compromise application. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 compromised the matter and opposite party No.2 does not want to proceed the matter against the applicants. He further submitted that applicants and opposite party no.2 have settled through compromise their private and civil dispute and as such opposite party no.2 does not wish to press the aforesaid case against the applicants. Opposite party no.2 is ready to withdraw the prosecution of the applicants and in view of the compromise, no fruitful purpose would be served if the prosecution is allowed to go on. 5. Learned counsel appearing for the opposite party no.2 does not dispute the correctness of the submission made by learned counsel for the applicants or the correctness of the documents relied upon by him. He submits that opposite party no. 2 has no objection, if the proceedings in the aforesaid case are quashed. 6. Learned AGA submitted that both the parties have settled their dispute out of the court, hence, no reason to proceed further. 7. The Hon'ble Apex Court in the case of Narindra Singh and others Vs. State of Punjab, (2014) 6 SCC 466, Parbatbhai Aahir @ Parbatbhai Vs. State of Gujarat (2017) 9 SCC, 641, Gian Singh Vs. State of Punjab (2012) 10 SCC 303 and State of M.P. Vs. Laxmi Narayanan (2019) 5 SCC 688, wherein Hon'ble Apex Court has categorically held that compromise can be made between the parties even in respect of certain cognizable and non-compoundable offences. Reference may also be made to the decision given by this Court in Shaifullah and others Vs. State of U.P. and another [2013 (83) ACC 278], in which, law expounded by the Hon'ble Apex Court in the aforesaid cases has been explained in detail. 8. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, as noted herein above, and also the submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, this Court is of the considered opinion that no useful purpose would be served by prolonging the proceedings of the above mentioned case. 9. Accordingly, the proceedings of Case No. 1930 of 2025 (State Vs. Gaurav Priya Sundaram and others) arising out of Case Crime No. 340 of 2024, Under Sections 147, 323, 504, 506 1.P.C., Police Station- Naugawan Sadat, NA528 No. 14752 of 2025 2 District- Amroha, is hereby quashed. 10. This application under Section 528 B.N.S.S. is accordingly allowed. September 15, 2025 Meenu Singh NA528 No. 14752 of 2025 3 (Deepak Verma,J.) Digitally signed by :- MEENU SINGH High Court of Judicature at Allahabad