Neutral Citation No. - 2025:AHC:74631 Court No. - 65 Case :- CRIMINAL MISC. BAIL APPLICATION No. - 14319 of 2025 Applicant :- Javed Opposite Party :- State Of U.P. And 3 Others Counsel for Applicant :- Shyam Sunder Mishra Counsel for Opposite Party :- Veer Kumar,G.A.,Shashi Chandra Hon'ble Krishan Pahal,J. 1. List has been revised. 2. Heard Sri Shyam Sunder Mishra, learned counsel for the applicant and Sri Veer Kumar, learned counsel for the informant as well as Sri Amit Kumar, learned State Law Officer and also perused the material placed on record. 3. Applicant seeks bail in Case Crime No. 26 of 2025, under Sections 70(1), 352, 351(2), 333 of BNS and Sections 5/6 of POCSO Act, Police Station - Thariyaon, District - Fatehpur, during the pendency of trial. 4. As per prosecution story, the applicant is stated to have established corporeal relationship with the victim several times upto 25.01.2025 at 02:00 PM. 5. Learned counsel for the applicant has argued that the applicant is absolutely innocent and has been falsely implicated in the present case. He has nothing to do with the said offence as alleged in the FIR. The FIR is delayed by about 10 days and there is no explanation of the said delay caused. 6. Learned counsel has also stated that the allegations levelled in the FIR do not stand fortified by any medical evidence whatsoever. The victim by her looks seems to be major although as per ossification test report, her age has come out to be 16 years, as such, a leverage of two years may be granted to the applicant on upper side in light of law laid down by Supreme Court. There is no criminal history of the applicant. The applicant is languishing in jail since 19.02.2025 and he is ready to cooperate with trial. In case, the applicant is released on bail, he will not misuse the liberty of bail. 7. Per contra, learned State Law Officer and learned counsel for the informant have vehemently opposed the bail application but unable to dispute the submissions raised by the learned counsel for the applicant and also the fact that the applicant has no criminal history. 8. With respect to the age of the victim, a leverage of two years can be granted to the applicant on the upper side in light of the judgement of Supreme Court passed in Jaya Mala Vs. State of J & K, (1982) 2 SCC 538 and Mohd. Imran Khan vs. State (Govt. of NCT of Delhi), (2011) 10 SCC 192, whereby it has been opined that the radiologist cannot predict the correct date of birth rather there is a long margin of 1 to 2 years on either side. 9. Considering the facts and circumstances of the case, submissions made by learned counsel for the parties, delay in lodging the FIR, age of the victim and there being no medical corroboration of the incident, I find it a fit case to release the applicant on bail. The bail application is allowed. 10. Let the applicant- Javed, who is involved in aforementioned case crime be released on bail on his furnishing a personal bond and two sureties each in the like amount to the satisfaction of the court concerned subject to following conditions. Further, before issuing the release order, the sureties be verified. i) The applicant will not tamper with the evidence during trial. ii) The applicant will not pressurise/intimidate with the prosecution witnesses. iii) The applicant will appear before the trial court on the date fixed. 11. In case of breach of any of the above conditions, it shall be a ground for cancellation of bail. 12. It is made clear that observations made in granting bail to the applicant shall not in any way affect the learned trial Judge in forming his independent opinion based on the testimony of the witnesses. Order Date:- 8.5.2025 Siddhant (Justice Krishan Pahal) Digitally signed by :- SIDDHANT SAHU High Court of Judicature at Allahabad