IN THE HIGH COURT OF JHARKHAND AT RANCHI A.B.A. No. 1025 of 2025 ------ 1. Firoz @ Firoz Ansari, aged about 31 years, son of Md. Gaffar Ansari 2. Md. Pappu Ansari @ Pappu @ Pappu Ansari, aged about 45 years, son of Serajuddin Ansari Both are residents of Village-Ranipur, P.O.-Bandanwar, P.S.-Pathargama, Dist.-Godda, Jharkhand … Petitioner Versus The State of Jharkhand … Opposite Party ------ CORAM: HON’BLE MR. JUSTICE ANIL KUMAR CHOUDHARY ------ For the Petitioners : Mr. Zaid Ahmed, Advocate For the State : Mr. Vishwanath Roy, Spl. P.P. ------ Order No.02 Dated- 14.02.2025 Heard the parties. Apprehending their arrest, the petitioners have moved this Court for grant of privilege of anticipatory bail in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.164 of 2024 registered under sections 126(2)/115(2)/303(2)/109/3(5) of the B.N.S., 2023. The Learned counsel for the petitioners submits that the allegation against the petitioners is that the petitioners in furtherance of common intention with the co-accused attempted to murder Md. Kudus Ansari- the informant of the case. It is further submitted that the allegations against the petitioners are all false and the alleged injury sustained by the victim is simple in nature. It is next submitted that for the selfsame occurrence from the side of the petitioners, the wife of the petitioner no.2 instituted Pathargama P.S. Case No. 165 of 2024 and the genesis of the occurrence is a petty dispute. It is also submitted that the petitioners have no intention to kill anybody. It is then submitted that the petitioners undertake to furnish sufficient security including cash security and also undertake to cooperate with the investigation of the case and further undertake that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case. Hence, it is submitted that the petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Learned Spl. P.P. opposes the prayer for grant of anticipatory bail. Considering the submissions of the counsels and the fact as discussed above, I am of the opinion that it is a fit case where the abovenamed petitioners be given the privilege of anticipatory bail. Hence, in the event of their arrest or surrender within a period of six weeks from the date of this order, they shall be released on bail on depositing cash security of Rs. 5,000/- each and on furnishing bail bond of Rs. 25,000/- (Rupees Twenty Five Thousand) each with two sureties of the like amount each to the satisfaction of learned S.D.J.M., Godda, in connection with Pathargama P.S. Case No.164 of 2024 with the condition that the petitioners will cooperate with the investigation of the case and appear before the Investigating Officer as and when noticed by him and will furnish their mobile numbers and a copy of their Aadhar Cards in the court below with the undertaking that they will not change their mobile numbers during the pendency of the case with further condition that they will not annoy or disturb the informant or any of his family members in any manner during the pendency of the case subject to the conditions laid down under Section 482 (2) of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2023. (Anil Kumar Choudhary, J.) Sonu/Gunjan-